Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 25196/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63866) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S PARTY v. MOLDOVA (No. 2)
Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 11 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (8) Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94
CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 25196/04
In that context, it has held that although individual interests must on occasion be subordinated to those of a group, democracy does not simply mean that the views of the majority must always prevail: a balance must be achieved which ensures the fair and proper treatment of minorities and avoids any abuse of a dominant position (see Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, § 63, Series A no. 44, and Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 112, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 25594/94
HASHMAN AND HARRUP v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 25196/04
The Court recalls that even such forms of protest as active physical obstruction of hunting were held to be an expression of an opinion (see Steel and Others v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 92, Reports 1998-VII; Hashman and Harrup v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25594/94, § 28, ECHR 1999-VIII). - EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 30668/96
WILSON, NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 25196/04
There may thus be positive obligations to secure the effective enjoyment of the right to freedom of association and assembly (see Wilson, National Union of Journalists and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 30668/96, 30671/96 and 30678/96, § 41, ECHR 2002-V) even in the sphere of relations between individuals (see Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben", cited above, § 32).
- EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 28793/02
CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S PARTY v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74
ARTICO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 25196/04
The Court has often reiterated that the Convention is intended to guarantee rights that are not theoretical or illusory, but practical and effective (see Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37). - EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82
Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 25196/04
The possibility of violent counter-demonstrations or the possibility of extremists with violent intentions joining the demonstration cannot as such take away that right (see Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, judgment of 21 June 1988, § 32, Series A no. 139). - EGMR, 13.08.1981 - 7601/76
YOUNG, JAMES ET WEBSTER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 25196/04
In that context, it has held that although individual interests must on occasion be subordinated to those of a group, democracy does not simply mean that the views of the majority must always prevail: a balance must be achieved which ensures the fair and proper treatment of minorities and avoids any abuse of a dominant position (see Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, § 63, Series A no. 44, and Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 112, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85
CASTELLS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 25196/04
Accordingly, interferences with the freedom of expression of an opposition member of parliament call for the closest scrutiny on the part of the Court (see Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 42, Series A no. 236). - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89
JERSILD v. DENMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 25196/04
The Court recalls in this context that the freedom of expression refers not only to "information" or "ideas" that are favourably received or regarded as inoffensive or as a matter of indifference, but also to those that offend, shock or disturb (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298).
- EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12
Russland verurteilt: 25.000 Euro wegen Festnahme nach Demo
The burden of proving the violent intentions of the organisers of a demonstration lies with the authorities (see Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 25196/04, § 23, 2 February 2010). - EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 72508/13
MERABISHVILI c. GÉORGIE
The cases in which the Court has voiced doubts about the cited aim without ruling on the issue (see, for example, Kandzhov, cited above, § 73; Tanase v. Moldova [GC], no. 7/08, §§ 164-70, ECHR 2010; Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459/03, § 117, ECHR 2011; and Stamose v. Bulgaria, no. 29713/05, § 32, ECHR 2012), left the issue open (see, for example, Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova, no. 28793/02, § 54, ECHR 2006-II; Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 25196/04, § 19, 2 February 2010; and Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 56896/17
LAURIJSEN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
The burden of proving the violent intentions of the organisers of a demonstration lies with the authorities (see Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 25196/04, § 23, 2 February 2010).
- EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 51168/15
Spanien: Foto des Königspaares verbrannt - Strafe unzulässig
Les requérants indiquent aussi que l'utilisation de symboles dans le cadre d'un acte politique a été considérée comme couverte par la liberté d'expression dans les affaires Fáber c. Hongrie (no 40721/08, 24 juillet 2012), Murat Vural c. Turquie (no 9540/07, 21 octobre 2014) et, plus particulièrement, Parti populaire démocrate-chrétien c. Moldova (no 2) (no 25196/04, 2 février 2010 - affaire dans laquelle des portraits de représentants politiques institutionnels et des drapeaux avaient étés brûlés). - EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 37273/10
SÜLEYMAN ÇELEBI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Il convient de noter qu'un syndicat, donc une personne morale, peut invoquer devant la Cour, son droit à la liberté de réunion pacifique à l'instar d'un partie politique ou d'une association (Stankov et Organisation macédonienne unie Ilinden c. Bulgarie, nos 29221/95 et 29225/95, CEDH 2001-IX, et Parti populaire démocrate-chrétien c. Moldova (no 2), no 25196/04, 2 février 2010). - EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 23158/20
MAKARASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
The burden of proving the violent intentions of the organisers of a demonstration lies with the authorities (see Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 25196/04, § 23, 2 February 2010). - EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 4161/13
KARUYEV v. RUSSIA
The protection of Article 10 is not limited to spoken or written word, for ideas and opinions are also capable of being communicated by nonverbal means of expression or through a person's conduct (see, among others, Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 25196/04, §§ 9 in fine and 27, 2 February 2010, concerning the public burning of the Russian flag and of a picture of the President of Russia; Tatár and Fáber v. Hungary, nos. - EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 22729/08
SÜLEYMAN ÇELEBI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
Il convient de noter qu'un syndicat, donc une personne morale, peut invoquer devant la Cour, son droit à la liberté de réunion pacifique à l'instar d'un partie politique ou d'une association (Stankov et Organisation macédonienne unie Ilinden c. Bulgarie, nos 29221/95 et 29225/95, CEDH 2001-IX, et Parti populaire démocrate-chrétien c. Moldova (no 2), no 25196/04, 2 février 2010).