Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GERZHIK v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Gerzhik v. Ukraine

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2012 - 40427/08

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 05.04.2001 - 41413/98

  MALICKA-WASOWSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2012 - 40427/08

  In this respect the Court reiterates that although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must accept that such actions necessarily prolong the proceedings concerned (see Malicka-Wasowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 41413/98, 5 April 2001, and Kolomoyets v. Ukraine, cited above, § 47).
• EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 18957/03

  RUDYSH v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2012 - 40427/08

  This delay appears attributable to the domestic courts and cannot be justified (see and compare with Rudysh v. Ukraine, no. 18957/03, § 21, 15 November 2007).

 
• EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 18291/04

  BALAGUTA v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2012 - 40427/08

  Accordingly, the Court considers that the proceedings were completed on 2 July 2007 with the final rejection, by the Kharkiv Regional Court, of the aforementioned request of the applicant, but not on 26 June 2003 as purported by the Government (see and compare with Balaguta v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 18291/04, 4 November 2008, and Kolomoyets v. Ukraine, no. 11208/03, §§ 19, 20 and 44, 15 July 2010).
• EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 31572/03

  YEROSHKINA v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2012 - 40427/08

  The Court further reiterates that it is for the Government pleading non-respect of the six-month rule to demonstrate the date on which the applicant became aware of the final decision (see Yeroshkina v. Ukraine, no. 31572/03, § 30, 18 June 2009).
• EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 11208/03

  KOLOMOYETS v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2012 - 40427/08

  Accordingly, the Court considers that the proceedings were completed on 2 July 2007 with the final rejection, by the Kharkiv Regional Court, of the aforementioned request of the applicant, but not on 26 June 2003 as purported by the Government (see and compare with Balaguta v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 18291/04, 4 November 2008, and Kolomoyets v. Ukraine, no. 11208/03, §§ 19, 20 and 44, 15 July 2010).