Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 14336/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,2397) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KECOJEVIC v. MONTENEGRO
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
KECOJEVIC v. MONTENEGRO
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
McFARLANE v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 14336/09
However, the only remedies which the Convention requires to be exhausted are those which relate to the breaches alleged and at the same time are available and sufficient (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 75, ECHR 1999-V; and McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 14336/09
However, the only remedies which the Convention requires to be exhausted are those which relate to the breaches alleged and at the same time are available and sufficient (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 75, ECHR 1999-V; and McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010). - EGMR - 45886/07
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 14336/09
The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 222, ECHR 2014 (extracts)); it falls to the respondent State to establish that these various conditions are satisfied (see Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 45, ECHR 2006-II; Selmouni v. France [GC], cited above, §§ 74-75; Vernillo v. France, 20 February 1991, § 27, Series A no. 198; and Dalia v. France, 19 February 1998, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I).
- EGMR, 05.03.2024 - 37364/10
BOSKOCEVIC v. SERBIA
There is no indication, nor did the applicant argue, that the remedy in question would not have been effective, or that there were special circumstances exempting him from the requirement to use it (see, mutatis mutandis, Kecojevic v. Montenegro (dec.), no. 14336/09, §§ 22-25, 2 February 2016).