Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALHAN v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Alhan v. Turkey

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 8163/07
• EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 8163/07

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 21086/04

  DANESHPAYEH c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 8163/07

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, no. 21086/04, § 28, 16 July 2009).

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, no. 21086/04, § 26-29, 16 July 2009; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Yücel DoÄ?an v. Turkey, no. 24647/04, §§ 18-22, 6 October 2009; and Hasefe v. Turkey, no. 25580/03, §§ 28-30, 8 January 2009).

• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25580/03

  HASEFE v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 8163/07

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, no. 21086/04, § 26-29, 16 July 2009; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Yücel DoÄ?an v. Turkey, no. 24647/04, §§ 18-22, 6 October 2009; and Hasefe v. Turkey, no. 25580/03, §§ 28-30, 8 January 2009).
• EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 24647/04

  YÜCEL DOGAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 8163/07

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, no. 21086/04, § 26-29, 16 July 2009; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Yücel DoÄ?an v. Turkey, no. 24647/04, §§ 18-22, 6 October 2009; and Hasefe v. Turkey, no. 25580/03, §§ 28-30, 8 January 2009).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 8163/07

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, no. 21086/04, § 26-29, 16 July 2009; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Yücel DoÄ?an v. Turkey, no. 24647/04, §§ 18-22, 6 October 2009; and Hasefe v. Turkey, no. 25580/03, §§ 28-30, 8 January 2009).

• EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 13423/09

  MEHMET SENTÜRK ET BEKIR SENTÜRK c. TURQUIE

  Elle a ainsi conclu que le système juridique turc offre aux justiciables des moyens qui, sur le plan théorique répondent aux exigences du volet procédural de l'article 2 (Sevim Güngör précité, Aliye Pak et Habip Pak c. Turquie (déc.), no 39855/02, 22 janvier 2008 et Serap Alhan c. Turquie (déc.), no 8163/07, 14 septembre 2010).
• EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 25018/10

  IBRAHIM DEMIRTAS c. TURQUIE

  Dans l'affaire Alhan c. Turquie, la Cour a déclaré que « [l]es obligations positives énoncées à l'article 2 peuvent être remplies si le système juridique en cause offre aux intéressés un recours devant les juridictions civiles'((déc.), no 8163/07, 14 septembre 2010, voir également Pak c. Turquie (déc.), no 39855/02, 22 janvier 2008).