Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOLOMUN v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SOLOMUN v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 679/11

  Furthermore, a deprivation of property can only be justified if it is shown to be "in the public interest" and if it satisfies the requirement of proportionality by striking a fair balance between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, §§ 69-74, Series A no. 52).
• EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 47940/99

  BALOGH v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 679/11

  To be effective, a remedy must be capable of resolving directly the impugned state of affairs (see Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940/99, § 30, 20 July 2004).
• EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 42916/04

  VARNIENE v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 679/11

  One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which requires, among other things, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question (see, amongst many others, Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII, and Varniene v. Lithuania, no. 42916/04, § 37, 12 November 2013).
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 679/11

  The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 36548/97

  PINCOVÁ ET PINC c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 679/11

  The rule of law, one of the fundamental principles of a democratic society, is inherent in all the Articles of the Convention (see Pincová and Pinc v. the Czech Republic, no. 36548/97, § 45, ECHR 2002-VIII, with further references).

• EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 20261/12

  Ungarn verstößt gegen Menschenrechtskonvention

  The Court has since reiterated on numerous occasions the importance of the principle of the rule of law in the context of Article 6 of the Convention (see, purely by way of indication, Siegle v. Romania, no. 23456/04, § 32, 16 April 2013; Varniene v. Lithuania, no. 42916/04, § 37, 12 November 2013; Solomun v. Croatia, no. 679/11, § 46, 2 April 2015; Ustimenko v. Ukraine, no. 32053/13, § 46, 29 October 2015; and Amirkhanyan v. Armenia, no. 22343/08, § 33, 3 December 2015), and also of the need to take account of the relevant rules of international law in interpreting and applying the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750/09, §§ 100, 102, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 32269/09

  MAZZEO c. ITALIE

  Il s'ensuit que l'ingérence dans le droit de propriété des requérants est illégale au regard du principe de la prééminence du droit inhérent à la Convention (Kehaya et autres, précité, § 76, Decheva et autres c. Bulgarie, no 43071/06, § 57, 26 juin 2012, et Solomun c. Croatie, no 679/11, § 62, 2 avril 2015).
• EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 45580/15

  TREGUET c. RUSSIE

  Appréciation de la Cour 28. Les principes généraux relatifs à la sécurité juridique, à la non-remise en cause d'une décision de justice définitive et à la portée du contrôle de la Cour dans ces domaines sont résumés dans les arrêts Solomun c. Croatie (no 679/11, §§ 47-48, 2 avril 2015), Elisei-Uzun et Andonie c. Roumanie (no 42447/10, §§ 42-43, 23 avril 2019), Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson c. Islande ([GC] no 26374/18, § 238, 1er décembre 2020), et, dernièrement, Tigrak c. Turquie (no 70306/10, §§ 48-49, 6 juillet 2021, et les références qui y sont citées).