Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.04.2019 - 69446/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,31679) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOYACIKÖY PANAYIA EVANGELISTRA CHURCH AND SCHOOL FOUNDATION v. TURKEY
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BOYACiKOY PANAYIA EVANGELISTRA KILISESI VE MEKTEBI VAKFi v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03
Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2019 - 69446/17
As far as the Government are concerned, if they claim non-exhaustion they must satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one, available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 71, 17 September 2009, and Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 141, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 71072/01
LEJA v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2019 - 69446/17
The Court reiterates that, in the event of there being a number of domestic remedies which an individual can pursue, that person is entitled to choose a remedy which addresses his or her essential grievance (see O"Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, § 109, ECHR 2014 (extracts), and also Leja v. Latvia, no. 71072/01, § 46, 14 June 2011). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2019 - 69446/17
The purpose of this rule is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94
Anforderungen an die unverzügliche Vorführung der festgenommenen Person i.S.d. …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2019 - 69446/17
An applicant who has exhausted a remedy that is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried others that were available but probably no more likely to be successful (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III, and Lagutin and Others v. Russia, nos. - EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 6228/09
LAGUTIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.04.2019 - 69446/17
6228/09 and 4 others, § 75, 24 April 2014).