Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KRISTIANSEN AND TYVIK AS v. NORWAY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Kristiansen and Tyvik As v. Norway

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 25498/08
• EGMR, 27.05.2015 - 25498/08

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96

  ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 25498/08

  This "right to a court", of which the right of access is an aspect, may be relied on by anyone who considers on arguable grounds that an interference with the exercise of his or her civil rights is unlawful and complains that no possibility was afforded to submit that claim to a court meeting the requirements of Article 6 § 1 (see, inter alia, Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 117, ECHR 2005-X, and Salontaji-Drobnjak v. Serbia, no. 36500/05, § 132, 13 October 2009).
• EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

  FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 25498/08

  Furthermore, a limitation will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (ibid.; see also, among many other authorities, Cordova v. Italy (no. 1), no. 40877/98, § 54, ECHR 2003-I, and the recapitulation of the relevant principles in Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 65, Series A no. 294-B).
• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 5335/07

  WURZER v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 25498/08

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that in civil length cases examined under Article 6 § 1, the period to be taken into consideration does not necessarily start when the competent tribunal was seized but may also encompass the prior administrative phase (see, for instance, Rambauske v. Austria, no. 45369/07, § 16, 28 January 2010; Wurzer v. Austria, no. 5335/07, § 45, 6 March 2012; Schouten and Meldrum v. the Netherlands, 9 December 1994, § 62, Series A no. 304; and Paulsen-Medalen and Svensson v. Sweden, 19 February 1998, § 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I).

 
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 25498/08

  As to the right of access to a court, the Court held as follows in Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC] (no. 36760/06, §§ 229-231, ECHR 2012):.
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 25498/08

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 1 secures to everyone the right to have any claim relating to his or her civil rights and obligations brought before a court or tribunal (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18).
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 9042/04

  A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 25498/08

  Their plea of non-exhaustion must therefore be rejected (see A. and E. Riis v. Norway, no. 9042/04, §§ 41 and 43, 31 May 2007; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 70, ECHR 2000-V).
• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 42527/98

  Enteignung eines Gemäldes in Tschechien auf Grund der Benes-Dekrete - …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 25498/08

  This is particularly true for the guarantees enshrined in Article 6, in view of the prominent place held in a democratic society by the right to a fair trial with all the guarantees under that Article (see Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 45, ECHR 2001-VIII).".
• EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 28341/95

  ROTARU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 25498/08

  Their plea of non-exhaustion must therefore be rejected (see A. and E. Riis v. Norway, no. 9042/04, §§ 41 and 43, 31 May 2007; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 70, ECHR 2000-V).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 28.01.2014 - C-583/12

  Sintax Trading - Vorgehen der Zollbehörden gegen Waren, die im Verdacht stehen, …

  30 - Vgl. Urteile des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte vom 2. Mai 2013, Kristiansen und Tyvik AS/Norwegen (25498/08, Rn. 51), und vom 13. September 2005, Vrábel und Durica/Tschechische Republik (…65291/01, Rn. 5, 38 bis 40); vgl. auch Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte vom 28. Juni 1978, König/Deutschland (…Serie A, Nr. 27, Rn. 88).