Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  S.N. c. SUÈDE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  Non-violation des art. 6-1 et 6-3-d (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  S.N. v. SWEDEN

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  No violation of Art. 6-1 and 6-3-d (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.01.2001 - 34209/96
• EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 34209/96

Wird zitiert von ... (41)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 33354/96

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Mitangeklagten als Zeugen im Sinne der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 34209/96

  Furthermore the Court has held in these cases and in Lucà v. Italy (no. 33354/96, § 40, ECHR 2001-II), where the defence could not examine or have examined a witness at any stage of the proceedings, that, when a conviction is based solely or to a decisive degree on statements by that witness, the rights of the defence have been restricted to an extent incompatible with the guarantees provided by Article 6.
• EGMR, 04.07.2000 - 43149/98

  KOK c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 34209/96

  However, it can be concluded from the case-law of the Court on the use of evidence obtained from anonymous witnesses that, where the defence - because of measures taken to protect vulnerable witnesses - is confronted with difficulties which criminal proceedings normally should not involve, the resulting handicaps for the defence should be sufficiently counterbalanced by the proceedings followed by the judicial authorities (see Doorson, cited above, p. 471, § 72; Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 23 April 1997, Reports 1997-III, p. 712, § 54; and Kok v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 43149/98, ECHR 2000-VI).
• EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86

  ASCH v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 34209/96

  Consequently, the complaint will be examined under the two provisions taken together (see, among other authorities, Asch v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, § 25).
• EGMR, 14.12.1999 - 37019/97

  A.M. v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 34209/96

  As a rule, these rights require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him either when he was making his statements or at a later stage of the proceedings (see Saïdi v. France, judgment of 20 September 1993, Series A no. 261-C, p. 56, § 43, and A.M. v. Italy, no. 37019/97, § 25, ECHR 1999-IX).
• EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82

  BRICMONT v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 34209/96

  It is normally for the national courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to hear a witness (see, among other authorities, Bricmont v. Belgium, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, § 89).

• EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 26766/05

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren: …

  Such sessions can be videotaped to ensure that the defence is also able to challenge the witness's credibility before the jury (see, for example, S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 52, ECHR 2002-V).
• EGMR, 17.11.2005 - 73047/01

  Konfrontationsrecht (Verwertungsverbot hinsichtlich einer entscheidenden …

  Jedoch sollten Aussagen, die von einem Zeugen unter Bedingungen erlangt wurden, in denen die Rechte der Verteidigung nicht in dem Maße gewahrt wurden, wie dies nach der Konvention normalerweise erforderlich ist, mit äußerster Sorgfalt behandelt werden (siehe Visser ./. die Niederlande, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 26668/95, Nr. 44, 14. Februar 2002; S. N. ./. Schweden , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 34209/96, Nr. 53, ECHR 2002-V).
• EGMR, 19.02.2009 - 3455/05

  A. u. a. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  There will not be a fair trial, however, unless any difficulties caused to the defendant by a limitation on his rights are sufficiently counterbalanced by the procedures followed by the judicial authorities (see, for example, Doorson v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 March 1996, § 70, Reports 1996-II; Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 23 April 1997, § 58, Reports 1997-III; Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052/95, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2000-II; S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-V; Botmeh and Alami v. the United Kingdom, no. 15187/03, judgment of 7 June 2007, § 37).

 
• EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 18757/06

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (Abgrenzung der unzulässigen Tatprovokation von …

  There will not be a fair trial, however, unless any difficulties caused to the defendant by a limitation on his rights are sufficiently counterbalanced by the procedures followed by the judicial authorities (see, for example, Doorson v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1996, § 70, Reports 1996-II; Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, § 58, Reports 1997-III; Jasper v. the United Kingdom (GC), no. 27052/95, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2000-II; S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-V; Botmeh and Alami v. the United Kingdom, no. 15187/03, § 37, 7 June 2007; and A. and Others v. the United Kingdom (GC), no. 3455/05, §§ 205 et seq., ECHR 2009-...).
• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

  Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair

  The Court reiterates that where the defence insists on the court hearing a witness or taking other evidence (such as an expert report, for instance), it is for the domestic courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to accept that evidence for examination at the trial (see S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 44, ECHR 2002-V, with further references to Bricmont v. Belgium, 7 July 1989, § 89, Series A no. 158).
• EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 51111/07

  Prozess gegen Kreml-Kritiker Chodorkowski war "unfair"

  The Court reiterates that where the defence insists on the court hearing a witness or taking other evidence (such as an expert report, for instance), it is for the domestic courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to accept that evidence for examination at the trial (see S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 44, ECHR 2002-V, with further references to Bricmont, cited above, § 89, and Hod?¾ic v. Croatia, no. 28932/14, §§ 61-62, 4 April 2019).
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 26766/05

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Mitangeklagten als Zeugen im Sinne der …

  Relying on S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, ECHR 2002?V, the Government argued there was no absolute rule that a conviction could not be based solely or to a decisive extent on evidence given by an absent or anonymous witness.
• EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 6228/09

  LAGUTIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  There will not be a fair trial, however, unless any difficulties caused to the defendant by a limitation on his rights are sufficiently counterbalanced by the procedures followed by the judicial authorities (see, for example, Doorson v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1996, § 70, Reports 1996-II; Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, § 58, Reports 1997-III; Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052/95, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2000-II; S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209/96, § 47, ECHR 2002-V; Botmeh and Alami v. the United Kingdom, no. 15187/03, § 37, 7 June 2007; A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, §§ 205 et seq., ECHR 2009-...; and Leas v. Estonia, no. 59577/08, §§ 76 et seq., 6 March 2012).
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 6293/04

  MIRILASHVILI v. RUSSIA

  Toutefois, pareilles preuves doivent être traitées avec une « extrême prudence'(voir S.N. c. Suède, no 34209/96, § 53, CEDH 2002-V).
• EGMR, 05.12.2002 - 34896/97

  CRAXI c. ITALIE

  Ni le requérant ni son défenseur n'ont eu, à aucun stade de la procédure, la possibilité d'interroger ces personnes qui, ayant formulé des affirmations utilisées comme preuves par les juges italiens, doivent être considérées comme des « témoins'aux termes de l'article 6 § 3 d) de la Convention (S. N. c. Suède, arrêt du 2 juillet 2002, no 34209/96, § 45, non publié).
• EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 28328/03

  AIGNER v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 22508/02

  F AND M v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 02.02.2021 - 22457/16

  X ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 26540/08

  ROSIN v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 51277/99

  Konfrontationsrecht (Verwertungsverbot hinsichtlich einer entscheidenden …
• EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 59632/09

  VRONCHENKO v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 44438/06

  J.B. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 41130/06

  KELLY v. IRELAND
• EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 40156/07

  A.S. v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 37959/02

  XHERAJ v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 17988/02

  ZHOGLO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 54789/00

  BOCOS-CUESTA v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 23.06.2011 - 20024/04

  ZDRAVKO PETROV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 09.11.2021 - 4608/17

  REBELO DOS SANTOS v. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 6386/17

  B.Z. v. POLAND
• EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 5699/11

  LUCIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 45756/05

  NOVIKAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 47986/99

  GOSSA v. POLAND
• EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 62390/00

  DMITRIJEVS v. LETTONIE
• EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 60966/00

  E.H. V. FINLAND
• EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 14000/12

  T.K. v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 23220/04

  A.L. v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 503/05

  KOVAC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 4591/04

  GUNNARSSON v. ICELAND
• EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 44484/98

  LORSE v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 30542/04

  D. v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 22695/03

  DEMSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 46602/99

  A.H. v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 24.04.2007 - 17122/02

  B. v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 54445/00

  VERHOEK v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 44223/98

  BROWN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM