Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 4356/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,66039) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHOA RAHIM v. NORWAY
N/A MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 2345/02
SAID v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 4356/08
The Court observes that the applicant's complaint raises issues under Article 2 of the Convention and that these concerned consequences of the expulsion for the applicant's life, health and welfare that were indissociable from any matters that fall to be considered under Article 3. In the Court's view, the complaint can be more appropriately be dealt with under the latter provision (see NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, § 95, 17 July 2008; Said v. the Netherlands, no. 2345/02, § 37, ECHR 2005-VI; D. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 May 1997, Reports 1997-III, § 59). - EGMR, 08.04.2008 - 21878/06
Uganda, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Europäischer Gerichtshof für …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 4356/08
As held by the Court in its constant case-law, "the mere possibility of ill-treatment on account of an unsettled situation in the receiving country does not in itself give rise to a breach of Article 3" (see Nnyanzi v. the United Kingdom, no. 21878/06, § 55, 8 April 2008 with further references). - EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 25904/07
Sri Lanka, Tamilen, Europäischer Menschenrechtsgerichtshof, menschenrechtswidrige …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 4356/08
The Court observes that the applicant's complaint raises issues under Article 2 of the Convention and that these concerned consequences of the expulsion for the applicant's life, health and welfare that were indissociable from any matters that fall to be considered under Article 3. In the Court's view, the complaint can be more appropriately be dealt with under the latter provision (see NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, § 95, 17 July 2008; Said v. the Netherlands, no. 2345/02, § 37, ECHR 2005-VI; D. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 May 1997, Reports 1997-III, § 59).