Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25574/94, 27/1996/646/831 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DE SANTA c. ITALIE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DE SANTA v. ITALY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch) - juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 06.07.1995 - 25574/94
- EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25574/94, 27/1996/646/831
Wird zitiert von ... (17) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25835/94
SOLDANI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25574/94
26/1996/645/830; 28/1996/647/832; 29/1996/648/833; 30/1996/649/834; 31/1996/650/835; 32/1996/651/836; 33/1996/652/837; 34/1996/653/838; 35/1996/654/839; 36/1996/655/840; 37/1996/656/841; 38/1996/657/842-843; 39/1996/658/844; 40/1996/659/845; 41/1996/660/846; 42/1996/661/847 and 43/1996/662/848. - EGMR, 26.11.1992 - 11519/85
Deumeland ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25574/94
It is true that claims for payment of civil-service pensions have been held by the Court to concern "civil" rights within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (see the Francesco Lombardo v. Italy judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-B, and the Massa v. Italy judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 265-B). - EGMR, 29.05.1986 - 9384/81
FELDBRUGGE v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25574/94
The Court implicitly takes as its starting-point the general principle stated in its case-law that where a claimed entitlement, including a purely pecuniary one, discloses features of both public and private law, Article 6 § 1 will be applicable if the latter are predominant (see, for example, the Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 99, pp. 13-16, §§ 30-40, and the Deumeland v. Germany judgment of the same date, Series A no. 100, pp. 22-25, §§ 60-74, where the asserted pecuniary claims were for social-security benefits).
- EGMR, 29.05.1986 - 8562/79
MASSA v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25574/94
The Court implicitly takes as its starting-point the general principle stated in its case-law that where a claimed entitlement, including a purely pecuniary one, discloses features of both public and private law, Article 6 § 1 will be applicable if the latter are predominant (see, for example, the Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 99, pp. 13-16, §§ 30-40, and the Deumeland v. Germany judgment of the same date, Series A no. 100, pp. 22-25, §§ 60-74, where the asserted pecuniary claims were for social-security benefits). - EGMR, 24.08.1993 - 14399/88
RYLLO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25574/94
It is true that claims for payment of civil-service pensions have been held by the Court to concern "civil" rights within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (see the Francesco Lombardo v. Italy judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-B, and the Massa v. Italy judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 265-B). - EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 23217/94
VIERO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25574/94
26/1996/645/830; 28/1996/647/832; 29/1996/648/833; 30/1996/649/834; 31/1996/650/835; 32/1996/651/836; 33/1996/652/837; 34/1996/653/838; 35/1996/654/839; 36/1996/655/840; 37/1996/656/841; 38/1996/657/842-843; 39/1996/658/844; 40/1996/659/845; 41/1996/660/846; 42/1996/661/847 and 43/1996/662/848.
- EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25835/94
FRANCESCO LOMBARDO v. ITALY
26/1996/645/830 ; 27/1996/646/831 ; 28/1996/647/832 ; 29/1996/648/833 ; 30/1996/649/834 ; 31/1996/650/835 ; 32/1996/651/836 ; 33/1996/652/837 ; 34/1996/653/838 ; 35/1996/654/839 ; 37/1996/656/841 ; 38/1996/657/842-843 ; 39/1996/658/844 ; 40/1996/659/845 ; 41/1996/660/846 ; 42/1996/661/847 et 43/1996/662/848. - EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 23217/94
SPURIO v. ITALY
27/1996/646/831 ; 28/1996/647/832 ; 29/1996/648/833 ; 30/1996/649/834 ; 31/1996/650/835 ; 32/1996/651/836 ; 33/1996/652/837 ; 34/1996/653/838 ; 35/1996/654/839 ; 36/1996/655/840 ; 37/1996/656/841 ; 38/1996/657/842-843 ; 39/1996/658/844 ; 40/1996/659/845 ; 41/1996/660/846 ; 42/1996/661/847 et 43/1996/662/848. - EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25837/94
DI LUCA AND SALUZZI v. ITALY
26/1996/645/830 ; 27/1996/646/831 ; 28/1996/647/832 ; 29/1996/648/833 ; 30/1996/649/834 ; 31/1996/650/835 ; 32/1996/651/836 ; 33/1996/652/837 ; 34/1996/653/838 ; 35/1996/654/839 ; 36/1996/655/840 ; 37/1996/656/841 ; 39/1996/658/844 ; 40/1996/659/845 ; 41/1996/660/846 ; 42/1996/661/847 et 43/1996/662/848.
- EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25586/94
PIZZI v. ITALY
26/1996/645/830; 27/1996/646/831; 28/1996/647/832; 30/1996/649/834; 31/1996/650/835; 32/1996/651/836; 33/1996/652/837; 34/1996/653/838; 35/1996/654/839; 36/1996/655/840; 37/1996/656/841; 38/1996/657/842-843; 39/1996/658/844; 40/1996/659/845; 41/1996/660/846; 42/1996/661/847 and 43/1996/662/848. - EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25839/94
NICODEMO v. ITALY
26/1996/645/830 ; 27/1996/646/831 ; 28/1996/647/832 ; 29/1996/648/833 ; 30/1996/649/834 ; 31/1996/650/835 ; 32/1996/651/836 ; 33/1996/652/837 ; 34/1996/653/838 ; 35/1996/654/839 ; 36/1996/655/840 ; 37/1996/656/841 ; 38/1996/657/842-843 ; 40/1996/659/845 ; 41/1996/660/846 ; 42/1996/661/847 et 43/1996/662/848. - EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25841/94
SCARFÒ v. ITALY
26/1996/645/830 ; 27/1996/646/831 ; 28/1996/647/832 ; 29/1996/648/833 ; 30/1996/649/834 ; 31/1996/650/835 ; 32/1996/651/836 ; 33/1996/652/837 ; 34/1996/653/838 ; 35/1996/654/839 ; 36/1996/655/840 ; 37/1996/656/841 ; 38/1996/657/842-843 ; 39/1996/658/844 ; 40/1996/659/845 ; 42/1996/661/847 et 43/1996/662/848. - EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25843/94
TROMBETTA c. ITALIE
26/1996/645/830 ; 27/1996/646/831 ; 28/1996/647/832 ; 29/1996/648/833 ; 30/1996/649/834 ; 31/1996/650/835 ; 32/1996/651/836 ; 33/1996/652/837 ; 34/1996/653/838 ; 35/1996/654/839 ; 36/1996/655/840 ; 37/1996/656/841 ; 38/1996/657/842-843 ; 39/1996/658/844 ; 40/1996/659/845 ; 41/1996/660/846 et 42/1996/661/847. - EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25587/94
ABENAVOLI c. ITALIE
26/1996/645/830; 27/1996/646/831; 28/1996/647/832; 29/1996/648/833; 31/1996/650/835; 32/1996/651/836; 33/1996/652/837; 34/1996/653/838; 35/1996/654/839; 36/1996/655/840; 37/1996/656/841; 38/1996/657/842-843; 39/1996/658/844; 40/1996/659/845; 41/1996/660/846; 42/1996/661/847 and 43/1996/662/848. - EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25836/94
FUSCO v. ITALY
26/1996/645/830 ; 27/1996/646/831 ; 28/1996/647/832 ; 29/1996/648/833 ; 30/1996/649/834 ; 31/1996/650/835 ; 32/1996/651/836 ; 33/1996/652/837 ; 34/1996/653/838 ; 35/1996/654/839 ; 36/1996/655/840 ; 38/1996/657/842-843 ; 39/1996/658/844 ; 40/1996/659/845 ; 41/1996/660/846 ; 42/1996/661/847 et 43/1996/662/848. - EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25590/94
ZILAGHE v. ITALY
26/1996/645/830 ; 27/1996/646/831 ; 28/1996/647/832 ; 29/1996/648/833 ; 30/1996/649/834 ; 32/1996/651/836 ; 33/1996/652/837 ; 34/1996/653/838 ; 35/1996/654/839 ; 36/1996/655/840 ; 37/1996/656/841 ; 38/1996/657/842-843 ; 39/1996/658/844 ; 40/1996/659/845 ; 41/1996/660/846 ; 42/1996/661/847 et 43/1996/662/848. - EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25575/94
GALLO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25831/94
LAGHI v. ITALY
- EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25833/94
ORLANDINI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25832/94
ARGENTO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25834/94
LAPALORCIA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25842/94
- EGMR, 02.09.1997 - 25840/94