Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.09.1998 - 23807/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ERKALO c. PAYS-BAS
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 13, Art. 41, Art. 26, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 13+5 Abs. 4 MRK
Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Violation de l'art. 5-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 5-4 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 13+5-4 Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ERKALO v. THE NETHERLANDS
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 13, Art. 26, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 13+5 Abs. 4 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 5-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 5-4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13+5-4 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - Convention ...
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 23807/94
- EGMR, 02.09.1998 - 23807/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.1998 - 23807/94
In its Winterwerp v. the Netherlands judgment (of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 21, § 49), the Court held that a delay of two weeks in the renewal of a detention order could not be regarded as unreasonable or excessive, and, as a result, did not involve an arbitrary deprivation of liberty. - EGMR, 29.02.1988 - 9106/80
BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.1998 - 23807/94
The Court recalls in this regard that it is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law (see the Bouamar v. Belgium judgment of 29 February 1988, Series A no. 129, p. 21, § 49).