Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 4596/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64546) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TAYANKO v. RUSSIA
Art. 6 MRK
Violation of Art. 6 Violation of P1-1 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99
RIABYKH c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 4596/02
The relevant domestic law governing the supervisory review procedure at the material time is summed up in the Court's judgment in the case of Ryabykh (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 31-42, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 07.07.2005 - 41302/02
MALINOVSKIY v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 4596/02
The Court considers that the applicant's claim to a "social tenancy agreement" was sufficiently established in the judgment of 5 July 2000 to constitute a "possession" falling within the ambit of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Malinovskiy v. Russia, no. 41302/02, § 46, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts)). - EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 3180/03
ZHELEZNYAKOVY v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 4596/02
Apparently there is a difference between an immediate and a conditioned order to provide housing (see Zheleznyakovy v. Russia (dec.), no. 3180/03, ECHR 15 March 2007). - EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 2999/03
DOVGUCHITS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 4596/02
As a result of the first set of re-trial proceedings the applicant, a disabled person residing with his wife and two daughters in a 11 square metres' hostel room (see paragraphs 7 and 24 above), could not, for a significant period of time, rely on and benefit from the final judgment of 5 July 2000 as to his immediate provision of housing (see, mitatis mutandis, Dovguchits v. Russia, no. 2999/03, § 35, 7 June 2007).