Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 15071/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,68061) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MAJ v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 3 MRK
Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 15071/02
Turning to the instant case, the Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Podbielski v. Poland, judgment of 30 October 1998, RJD 1998-VIII; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, 13 July 2004 and Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, 21 September 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Skawinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 42096/98, 4 March 2003; Malasiewicz v. Poland, no. 22072/02, 14 October 2003; Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, 31 May 2005; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-... and Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...). - EGMR, 14.10.2003 - 22072/02
MALASIEWICZ v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 15071/02
Turning to the instant case, the Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Podbielski v. Poland, judgment of 30 October 1998, RJD 1998-VIII; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, 13 July 2004 and Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, 21 September 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Skawinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 42096/98, 4 March 2003; Malasiewicz v. Poland, no. 22072/02, 14 October 2003; Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, 31 May 2005; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-... and Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...). - EGMR, 13.07.2004 - 66096/01
ZYNGER v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 15071/02
Turning to the instant case, the Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Podbielski v. Poland, judgment of 30 October 1998, RJD 1998-VIII; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, 13 July 2004 and Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, 21 September 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Skawinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 42096/98, 4 March 2003; Malasiewicz v. Poland, no. 22072/02, 14 October 2003; Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, 31 May 2005; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-... and Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...).
- EGMR, 21.09.2004 - 10675/02
KUSMIEREK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 15071/02
Turning to the instant case, the Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Podbielski v. Poland, judgment of 30 October 1998, RJD 1998-VIII; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, 13 July 2004 and Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, 21 September 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Skawinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 42096/98, 4 March 2003; Malasiewicz v. Poland, no. 22072/02, 14 October 2003; Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, 31 May 2005; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-... and Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 15071/02
Turning to the instant case, the Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Podbielski v. Poland, judgment of 30 October 1998, RJD 1998-VIII; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, 13 July 2004 and Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, 21 September 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Skawinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 42096/98, 4 March 2003; Malasiewicz v. Poland, no. 22072/02, 14 October 2003; Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, 31 May 2005; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-... and Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 53487/99
MERIAKRI v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 15071/02
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; Meriakri v. Moldova (striking out), no. 53487/99, §§ 29-32, 1 March 2005; Swedish Transport Workers Union v. Sweden (striking out), no. 53507/99, §§ 24-27, 18 July 2006 and Van Houten v. the Netherlands (striking out), no. 25149/03, §§ 34-37, ECHR 2005-IX). - EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 61444/00
KRASUSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 15071/02
Turning to the instant case, the Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Podbielski v. Poland, judgment of 30 October 1998, RJD 1998-VIII; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, 13 July 2004 and Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, 21 September 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Skawinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 42096/98, 4 March 2003; Malasiewicz v. Poland, no. 22072/02, 14 October 2003; Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, 31 May 2005; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-... and Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...). - EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 25149/03
Rechtssache V. H. gegen die NIEDERLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 15071/02
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; Meriakri v. Moldova (striking out), no. 53487/99, §§ 29-32, 1 March 2005; Swedish Transport Workers Union v. Sweden (striking out), no. 53507/99, §§ 24-27, 18 July 2006 and Van Houten v. the Netherlands (striking out), no. 25149/03, §§ 34-37, ECHR 2005-IX).