Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 10762/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55821) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- SG Marburg, 07.12.2011 - 9/10
Abrechenbarkeit von Besuchen eines Arztes mit einer Praxis in einem Heim als …
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 10762/04
The events on 9/10 December 2000.The lesions could have occurred on the night of 9/10 December 2000.
- EGMR, 11.10.2007 - 2893/02
MANTOG c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 10762/04
However, it has also ruled that the matter of the independence and impartiality of a court is to be examined in the concrete circumstances of the case (see Mantog v. Romania, no. 2893/02, § 70, 11 October 2007). - EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79
PIERSACK v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 10762/04
As to the condition of "impartiality" within the meaning of that provision, there are two tests to be applied: the first consists in trying to determine the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case (the objective test), and the second in ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (the subjective test) (see Piersack v. Belgium, 1 October 1982, § 30, Series A no. 53, and Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 65, Reports 1998-IV). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 10762/04
In these circumstances, the first applicant's discontent with the reclassification of the crimes, the sentences imposed and the amount of damages awarded appear to be complaints of a fourth-instance nature which the Court, by virtue of the subsidiarity principle, will not deal with (see, mutatis mutandis, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 46430/99
BARBU ANGHELESCU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 10762/04
The Court has already ruled that the fact that investigations into allegations of police abuse were carried out by a military prosecutor and military courts could raise doubts as to the independence and impartiality of those officials, in so far as both police officers on the one hand and the military prosecutors and military judges on the other hand belonged to the same military hierarchy (see Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no. 46430/99, § 67, 5 October 2004).