Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 25965/03 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KOKSHAROVA v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Koksharova v. Russia
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99
RIABYKH c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 25965/03
For the relevant provisions on the supervisory review proceedings contained in the 1964 Code of Civil Procedure, which was in force at the material time, see the Court's judgment in the case of Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 31-42, ECHR 2003-IX.The Court reiterates that the quashing by way of supervisory review of a judicial decision which has become final and binding may render the litigant's right to a court illusory and infringe the principle of legal certainty (see, among many other authorities, Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 56-58, ECHR 2003-IX).
- EGMR, 07.07.2005 - 41302/02
MALINOVSKIY v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 25965/03
The judgment thus created an asset within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Vasilopoulou v. Greece, no. 47541/99, § 22, 21 March 2002, and Malinovskiy v. Russia, no. 41302/02, § 43, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts)). - EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 20887/03
KOT v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 25965/03
Departures from that principle are justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see Kot v. Russia, no. 20887/03, § 24, 18 January 2007, and Protsenko v. Russia, no. 13151/04, §§ 25-34, 31 July 2008). - EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 13151/04
PROTSENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 25965/03
Departures from that principle are justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see Kot v. Russia, no. 20887/03, § 24, 18 January 2007, and Protsenko v. Russia, no. 13151/04, §§ 25-34, 31 July 2008).