Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 16397/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,30929
EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 16397/07 (https://dejure.org/2018,30929)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 02.10.2018 - 16397/07 (https://dejure.org/2018,30929)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 02. Oktober 2018 - 16397/07 (https://dejure.org/2018,30929)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,30929) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    TSAKOYEVY v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

    ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 16397/07
    They referred in this connection to the case of Assanidze v. Georgia ([GC], no. 71503/01, §§ 202-03, ECHR 2004-II).
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 16397/07
    The Court has to establish first whether the costs and expenses indicated by the applicants were actually incurred and whether they were necessary (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324).
  • EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 21894/93

    AKKUM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 16397/07
    Applying the above-mentioned principles, it has concluded that it would be sufficient for the applicants to make a prima facie case of abduction by State agents, thus falling within the control of the authorities, and it would then be for the Government to discharge their burden of proof, either by disclosing documents in their exclusive possession or by providing a satisfactory and convincing explanation of how the events in question occurred (see Togcu v. Turkey, no. 27601/95, § 95, 31 May 2005, and Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894/93, § 211, ECHR 2005-II (extracts) and, in relation to an abduction in Kabardino-Balkaria, Tsechoyev v. Russia, no. 39358/05, 15 March 2011).
  • EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

    IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 16397/07
    The loss of earnings applies to close relatives of disappeared persons, including spouses, elderly parents and minor children (see, among other authorities, Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 213, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 15.03.2011 - 39358/05

    TSECHOYEV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 16397/07
    Applying the above-mentioned principles, it has concluded that it would be sufficient for the applicants to make a prima facie case of abduction by State agents, thus falling within the control of the authorities, and it would then be for the Government to discharge their burden of proof, either by disclosing documents in their exclusive possession or by providing a satisfactory and convincing explanation of how the events in question occurred (see Togcu v. Turkey, no. 27601/95, § 95, 31 May 2005, and Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894/93, § 211, ECHR 2005-II (extracts) and, in relation to an abduction in Kabardino-Balkaria, Tsechoyev v. Russia, no. 39358/05, 15 March 2011).
  • EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 49379/09

    SHAFIYEVA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 16397/07
    Conversely, where the applicants failed to make a prima facie case, the burden of proof could not be reversed (see, for example, Shafiyeva v. Russia, no. 49379/09, § 71, 3 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

    ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 16397/07
    A summary of the principles relating to the requirements of such investigation can be found in Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014/05, §§ 169-82, 14 April 2015, and Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, §§ 229-39, ECHR 2016.
  • EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 48523/19

    N.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    The Court confirms that since it has been established that Mr T.M., Mr Kh.Kh., Mr Sh.Yu., Mr M.S., Mr Aliyev and Mr Umarov were detained by State agents without any legal grounds or acknowledgment of such detention, this constitutes a particularly serious violation of Article 5 of the Convention (see Tsakoyevy v. Russia, no. 16397/07, § 142, 2 October 2018, and A.A. and Others v. Russia, cited above, § 70).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 44592/16

    BOBOC AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    In these circumstances, and taking into account its findings in paragraphs 52-58 above, the Court concludes that the applicants' complaint under Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the death of Mr Valeriu Boboc must be rejected as manifestly ill-founded pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention (see Tsakoyevy v. Russia, no. 16397/07, § 136, 2 October 2018).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht