Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GILLBERG v. SWEDEN

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 10 (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GILLBERG c. SUEDE

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Partiellement irrecevable Non-violation de l'art. 8 Non-violation de l'art. 10 (französisch)

• lda.brandenburg.de

  Allgemein zugängliche Quelle, Anwendungsbereich/Zuständigkeit, Personenbezogene Daten

• fragdenstaat.de

  Allgemein zugängliche Quelle - Anwendungsbereich/ Zuständigkeit - Personenbezogene Daten

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
• lda.brandenburg.de (Kurzinformation)

  Allgemein zugängliche Quelle, Anwendungsbereich/Zuständigkeit, Personenbezogene Daten

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 41723/06
• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 41723/06

  The Court observes in this respect that doctors, psychiatrists and researchers may have a similar interest to that of journalists in protecting their sources (see e.g. Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, ECHR 1999-I and Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, application no. 51772/99, 25 February 2003).
• EGMR, 20.06.2000 - 33274/96

  FOXLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 41723/06

  123. Moreover, doctors, psychiatrists and researchers may have a similar interest to that, for example, of lawyers in protecting professional secrecy with clients (see e.g. Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, series A no. 251-B, Foxley v. The United Kingdom, no. 33274/96, 20 June 2000 and Strohal v. Austria, no. 20871/92, Commission decision of 7 April 1994).
• EGMR, 25.02.2003 - 51772/99

  ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. LUXEMBOURG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 41723/06

  The Court observes in this respect that doctors, psychiatrists and researchers may have a similar interest to that of journalists in protecting their sources (see e.g. Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, ECHR 1999-I and Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, application no. 51772/99, 25 February 2003).

 
• EKMR, 07.04.1994 - 20871/92

  STROHAL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 41723/06

  123. Moreover, doctors, psychiatrists and researchers may have a similar interest to that, for example, of lawyers in protecting professional secrecy with clients (see e.g. Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, series A no. 251-B, Foxley v. The United Kingdom, no. 33274/96, 20 June 2000 and Strohal v. Austria, no. 20871/92, Commission decision of 7 April 1994).
• EGMR, 22.07.2003 - 24209/94

  Y.F. c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 41723/06

  It covers the physical and psychological integrity of a person (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III, and Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 33, ECHR 2003-IX) and may extend to certain activities of a professional nature (see, for example Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 41723/06

  Moreover, in several cases concerning consequences of a criminal conviction, Article 8 has been found applicable (see, for example, Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, ECHR 2006-XII, and Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, 23 June 2008) or concerning measures related to criminal proceedings (see, for example, S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, 4 December 2008).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 41723/06

  It covers the physical and psychological integrity of a person (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III, and Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 33, ECHR 2003-IX) and may extend to certain activities of a professional nature (see, for example Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III).