Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VAN DEN BERG AND SARRI v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 13 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 7239/08

  (i) The Convention cannot be interpreted in a vacuum, but, in accordance with Article 31 § 3 (c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), account is to be taken of any relevant rules of international law applicable to the Contracting Parties (Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 90, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 27.04.2000 - 47457/99

  Bestimmung des Aufenthaltsorts gemeinsamer Kinder nach Trennung der Eltern; Eine …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 7239/08

  47457/99 and 47458/99, ECHR 2000-IV; Bianchi, cited above, § 92; and Carlson, cited above, § 69).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 7239/08

  To that end they enjoy a certain margin of appreciation, which remains subject, however, to a European supervision whereby the Court reviews under the Convention the decisions that those authorities have taken in the exercise of that power (see, for example, Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A, and Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544/99, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2002-I; see also Tiemann v. France and Germany (dec.), nos.

 
• EGMR, 06.12.2005 - 14600/05

  ESKINAZI ET CHELOUCHE c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 7239/08

  (vii) In addition, the Court must ensure that the decision-making process leading to the adoption of the impugned measures by the domestic court was fair and allowed those concerned to present their case fully (see Tiemann, cited above, and Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600/05, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 8153/04

  MARSÁLEK c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 7239/08

  (v) "The child's interests" are primarily considered to be the following two: to have his or her ties with his or her family maintained, unless it is proved that such ties are undesirable, and to have his or her development in a sound environment ensured (see, among many other authorities, Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Marsálek v. the Czech Republic, no. 8153/04, § 71, 4 April 2006).
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 39388/05

  Maumousseau und Washington ./. Frankreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 7239/08

  (iv) In this area the decisive issue is whether a fair balance between the competing interests at stake - those of the child, of the two parents, and of public order - has been struck, within the margin of appreciation afforded to States in such matters (see Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388/05, § 62, ECHR 2007-XIII), bearing in mind, however, that the child's best interests must be the primary consideration (see, to that effect, Gnahoré v. France, no. 40031/98, § 59, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 25735/94

  Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 7239/08

  (v) "The child's interests" are primarily considered to be the following two: to have his or her ties with his or her family maintained, unless it is proved that such ties are undesirable, and to have his or her development in a sound environment ensured (see, among many other authorities, Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Marsálek v. the Czech Republic, no. 8153/04, § 71, 4 April 2006).

• EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 27853/09

  X v. LATVIA

  Il est néanmoins important de noter que, depuis l'arrêt Neulinger et Shuruk, la Cour a jugé irrecevables pour la plupart des griefs très similaires (Van den Berg et Sarrì c. Pays-Bas (déc.), n° 7239/08, 2 novembre 2010 ; Lipkowsky et McCormack c. Allemagne (déc.), n° 26755/10, 18 janvier 2011 ; Tarkhova c. Ukraine (déc.), n° 8984/11, 6 septembre 2011 ; M.R. et L.R. c. Estonie (déc.), n° 13429/12, 15 mai 2012, et Chernat et autres c. Roumanie (déc.), n° 13212/09, 3 juillet 2012).
• EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 43730/07

  GAJTANI c. SUISSE

  Quant au grief visant la procédure en ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine qui a mené à l'attribution de la garde des enfants au père, la Cour observe, que cette procédure ne saurait engager la responsabilité de la Suisse en vertu de l'article premier de la Convention, selon lequel les droits et libertés garantis sont reconnus par les parties contractantes à toute personne relevant de « leur juridiction'(voir, dans ce sens, Van den Berg et Sarrì c. Pays-Bas (déc.), no 7239/08, 2 novembre 2010).