Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 37641/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,35981) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MATWIEJCZUK v. POLAND
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 8 with regard to monitoring of correspondence Not necessary to examine Art. 34 No violation of Art. 8 with regard to delay of correspondence Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 12.10.2000 - 37641/97
- EGMR, 04.06.2002 - 37641/97
- EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 37641/97
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 37641/97
However, it considers that the period began on 11 September 1996, when the applicant was taken into custody (see, mutatis mutandis, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 145, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 37641/97
However, the Court has recognised the impossibility of attaining absolute certainty in the framing of laws and the risk that the search for certainty may entail excessive rigidity (see, among other authorities, Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 33, §§ 86-88). - EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
W. c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 37641/97
Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty (see, among other authorities, the W. v. Switzerland judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, p. 15, § 30). - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64
Wemhoff ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 37641/97
The Court agrees that the end of the relevant period fell on 4 May 1999, as under its case-law the end of period referred to in Article 5 § 3 is the day on which the charge is determined, even if only by a court of first instance (see the Wemhoff v. Germany judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 23, § 9). - EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88
CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 37641/97
Had domestic authorities been concerned about the risk of fabrication, they could have avoided it by adding to the register of incoming mail information about its condition (see, mutatis mutandis, Campbell v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 February 1992, Series A no. 233, p. 22, § 62; Halford v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III, p. 1016, § 48).