Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GROBIN v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Grobin v. Slovenia

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 28662/05

  MAKSIMOVIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07

  For relevant domestic law see the judgment Maksimovic v. Slovenia (no. 28662/05, 22 June 2010).

  Nor is it inadmissible on any other grounds (see Maksimovic v. Slovenia, no. 28662/05, 22 June 2010, §§ 21-24).

• EGMR, 23.03.1999 - 36385/97

  VALMONT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07

  In order to claim to be a victim of a violation, a person must be directly affected by the impugned measure (see, for example, Buckley v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, p. 1288, §§ 56-59, Valmont v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 36385/97, decision of 23 March 1999, and Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, 28 February 2006).
• EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 2476/02

  THÉVENON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07

  In order to claim to be a victim of a violation, a person must be directly affected by the impugned measure (see, for example, Buckley v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, p. 1288, §§ 56-59, Valmont v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 36385/97, decision of 23 March 1999, and Thevenon v. France (dec.), no. 2476/02, 28 February 2006).

 
• EGMR, 06.04.2006 - 42274/02

  BIZJAK JAGODIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Barisic v. Slovenia, no. 32600/05, §§ 45-47, 18 October 2012; Stojc v. Slovenia, no. 20159/06, §§ 22-25, 18 October 2012; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006 and Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006) the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement.
• EGMR, 27.04.2006 - 38528/02

  RODIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Barisic v. Slovenia, no. 32600/05, §§ 45-47, 18 October 2012; Stojc v. Slovenia, no. 20159/06, §§ 22-25, 18 October 2012; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006 and Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006) the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement.
• EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 20159/06

  STOJC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Barisic v. Slovenia, no. 32600/05, §§ 45-47, 18 October 2012; Stojc v. Slovenia, no. 20159/06, §§ 22-25, 18 October 2012; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006 and Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006) the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement.
• EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 32600/05

  BARISIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Barisic v. Slovenia, no. 32600/05, §§ 45-47, 18 October 2012; Stojc v. Slovenia, no. 20159/06, §§ 22-25, 18 October 2012; Bizjak Jagodic v. Slovenia, no. 42274/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006 and Rodic v. Slovenia, no. 38528/02, §§ 18-20, 27 April 2006) the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement.
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 33347/07

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).