Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 41662/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,31098) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DROGOBETSKAYA v. UKRAINE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Drogobetskaya v. Ukraine
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 30.03.2004 - 66561/01
MERIT v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 41662/05
The Court further refers to its finding in the Merit case about the lack of an effective and accessible remedy under domestic law for complaints in respect of the length of criminal proceedings (see Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, § 78-79, 30 March 2004). - EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 9025/03
PILIPEY v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 41662/05
As regards other delays, the Court observes in this connection that it is the role of the domestic courts to manage the proceedings before them so that they are expeditious and effective (see Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 183, ECHR 2006-V and Pilipey v. Ukraine, no. 9025/03, § 31, 18 June 2009). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 41662/05
The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.01.2013 - 41662/05
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).