Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 03.02.2005 - 18297/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2005,47397
EGMR, 03.02.2005 - 18297/03 (https://dejure.org/2005,47397)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03.02.2005 - 18297/03 (https://dejure.org/2005,47397)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03. Februar 2005 - 18297/03 (https://dejure.org/2005,47397)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,47397) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    LADNER v. AUSTRIA

    Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14+8, Art. 14, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41, Art. 3 MRK
    Violation of Art. 14+8 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Inadmissible under Art. 3 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award - Convention ...

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

  • EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 39392/98

    L. AND V. v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2005 - 18297/03
    The Court notes that the legal situation has remained unchanged since 9 January 2003, when it gave its L. and V. v. Austria judgment (nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I).
  • EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 31913/07

    E.B. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA

    69756/01 and 6306/02, 21 October 2004; Landner v. Austria, no. 18297/03, 3 February 2005; H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos.
  • EGMR - 48779/07

    [ENG]

    Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of his sex or other status, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 because of the Austrian courts" and authorities" refusal to delete his conviction under Section 209 of the Criminal Code? (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I, Landner. v. Austria, no. 18297/03, 3 February 2005, H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005).
  • EGMR - 48777/07

    [ENG]

    Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of his sex or other status, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 because of the Austrian courts" and authorities" refusal to delete his conviction under Section 209 of the Criminal Code? (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I, Landner. v. Austria, no. 18297/03, 3 February 2005, H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005).
  • EGMR - 48098/07

    [ENG]

    Did the applicant suffer discrimination on the ground of his sex or other status, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 14 because of the Austrian courtsâ?² and authoritiesâ?² refusal to delete his conviction under Section 209 of the Criminal Code? (Reference is made to the Court's judgements in the case of L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I, Landner. v. Austria, no. 18297/03, 3 February 2005, H.G. and G.B. v. Austria, nos. 11084/02 and 15306/02, 2 June 2005).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht