Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 4661/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,54517) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SÜKRAN YILDIZ v. TURKEY
(englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.07.2007 - 4661/02
- EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 4661/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 27561/02
SOLMAZ c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 4661/02
The Court refers to the principles adopted in the Solmaz v. Turkey judgment (no. 27561/02, § 36, ECHR 2007-...), where it held that, if the applicant was imprisoned continuously, the multiple, consecutive detention periods should be regarded as a whole and the six-month period should only start running from the end of the last period. - EGMR, 06.05.2008 - 20817/04
NART v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 4661/02
It concluded that Article 298 of the Code of Criminal Procedure could not be considered an effective remedy and found a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Kosti and Others, cited above, §§ 21-25; Nart v. Turkey, no. 20817/04, § 39, 6 May 2008; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 71-72, ECHR 2005-IV). - EGMR, 20.09.2007 - 23438/02
MUHAMET AKYOL v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 4661/02
As a result, given the applicant's continued detention throughout these different phases, the six-month period should only start running from the end of the last period of pre-trial custody, which is 10 August 2001 (see Akyol v. Turkey, no. 23438/02, § 25, 20 September 2007).