Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 24564/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55773) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MESHCHERYAKOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
No violation of Art. 6-1 (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 24564/04
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 24564/04
Nor did the Government supply any example from domestic practice showing that, by using the means in question, it was possible for the applicant to obtain such a relief (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 159, ECHR 2000-XI).
- EGMR, 18.02.2016 - 44099/04
FATEYENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
As regards the domestic remedies existing prior to the adoption of the aforementioned pilot judgment, the Court reiterates its previous finding that at the time when the applicants brought their applications to Strasbourg there was no effective remedy under Russian law capable of affording redress for the unreasonable length of civil proceedings (see Meshcheryakov v. Russia, no. 24564/04, § 36, 3 February 2011 with references therein, and Zaytsev and Others, cited above, § 48). - EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 40618/04
GORDEYEV v. RUSSIA
Having regard to the overall length of the proceedings and the levels of jurisdiction involved, as well as the applicant's own responsibility for the delays, the Court concludes that the length of the proceedings taken as a whole did not exceed the "reasonable time" requirement set out in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Meshcheryakov v. Russia, no. 24564/04, § 45, 3 February 2011).