|EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 8460/07|
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,57103) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Wird zitiert von ... (10)
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
MALIK BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJANMoreover, unlike the cases in which the applicants were able to produce a contract for legal services, according to which, the amounts due were to be paid in the event that the Court found a violation of the applicants" rights (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, §§ 72-75, 3 February 2011, and Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 85-89, 17 April 2012), in the present case no such a contract was submitted to the Court.
- EGMR, 26.11.2015 - 24213/08
BASENKO v. UKRAINEHowever, in several cases concerning Article 6 § 1 of the Convention where it was in dispute whether the applicant had been notified, the Court held, in circumstances similar to the present case, that normally such statements in the hearing records cannot, without more, be viewed as sufficient evidence of notice (see, for example, Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, §§ 19 and 41, 3 February 2011; Fyodorov and Fyodorova v. Ukraine, no. 39229/03, § 100, 7 July 2011; and Kolegovy v. Russia, no. 15226/05, § 41, 1 March 2012).
- EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 49192/08
ALLAHVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJANThus, having regard to the content of the Government's unilateral declaration, the Court finds that the Government have failed to establish a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (compare Kessler v. Switzerland, no. 10577/04, § 24, 26 July 2007; Hakimi v. Belgium, no. 665/08, § 29, 29 June 2010; and Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, § 31, 3 February 2011).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.