Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 3, Art. 35 MRK
  No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Hutchinson v. the United Kingdom

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)

  Hutchinson v. the United Kingdom

  [21.10.2015]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 57592/08
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 57592/08

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 15018/11

  HARAKCHIEV AND TOLUMOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 57592/08

  15018/11 and 61199/12, §§ 245-246, ECHR 2014 (extracts).

  Unlike in the unanimous judgment of the same Section in the case of Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria (nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, ECHR 2014), the majority in the present case failed to express any view as to whether, how and at what point the interpretation of the domestic law established in Bieber [2009] and R v. Newell; R v. McLoughlin [2014] changed, ceased to apply or made the applicant's situation more compatible with the principles laid down by the Grand Chamber in examining the situation of the applicants in Vinter.

• EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04

  KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 57592/08

  However, if the life sentence is as a matter of law or practice irreducible, this may raise an issue under Article 3 (see Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 97, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 26083/94

  WAITE AND KENNEDY v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 57592/08

  The Court recalls that it is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to resolve problems of interpretation of domestic legislation (see, amongst many other authorities, Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153/11, § 80, 25 March 2014; Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 102, ECHR 2013; and Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999-I).

 
• EGMR, 20.05.2014 - 73593/10

  LÁSZLÓ MAGYAR v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 57592/08

  24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07, §§ 193-198, 18 March 2014; László Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593/10, §§ 46-53, 20 May 2014; Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos.
• EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 24069/03

  ÖCALAN c. TURQUIE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 57592/08

  24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07, §§ 193-198, 18 March 2014; László Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593/10, §§ 46-53, 20 May 2014; Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos.
• EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 48843/99

  COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 57592/08

  In the circumstances of this case where, following the Grand Chamber's judgment in which it expressed doubts about the clarity of domestic law, the national court has specifically addressed those doubts and set out an unequivocal statement of the legal position, the Court must accept the national court's interpretation of domestic law (see, mutatis mutandis, Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843/99, § 125, ECHR 2003-XII).