Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 52391/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,39119) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RAMSAHAI AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 52391/99
- EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 52391/99
- EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 52391/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 52391/99
For the remainder, the applicants restate their arguments as set out in the context of Article 2 of the Convention, referring in addition to the Court's case law (judgments in the cases of Finucane, cited above; Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, ECHR 2002-IV; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, ECHR 2004-...; and Ä°pek v. Turkey, no. 25760/94, ECHR 2004-...). - EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 52391/99
For the remainder, the applicants restate their arguments as set out in the context of Article 2 of the Convention, referring in addition to the Court's case law (judgments in the cases of Finucane, cited above; Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, ECHR 2002-IV; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, ECHR 2004-...; and Ä°pek v. Turkey, no. 25760/94, ECHR 2004-...). - EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 29178/95
FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 52391/99
In addition, a civil action is not a remedy capable of ensuring "the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life and, in those cases involving State agents or bodies, to ensure their accountability for deaths occurring under their responsibility" (Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178/95, § 67, ECHR 2003-VIII), the less so since the costs and the risk of an unfavourable outcome would have to be borne by the applicants themselves. - EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 25760/94
IPEK c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 52391/99
For the remainder, the applicants restate their arguments as set out in the context of Article 2 of the Convention, referring in addition to the Court's case law (judgments in the cases of Finucane, cited above; Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, ECHR 2002-IV; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, ECHR 2004-...; and Ä°pek v. Turkey, no. 25760/94, ECHR 2004-...). - EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 52391/99
For the remainder, the applicants restate their arguments as set out in the context of Article 2 of the Convention, referring in addition to the Court's case law (judgments in the cases of Finucane, cited above; Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, ECHR 2002-IV; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, ECHR 2004-...; and Ä°pek v. Turkey, no. 25760/94, ECHR 2004-...).