Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 21415/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,47204) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ROGELJ v. SLOVENIA
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 21415/02
The reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 21415/02
Thus the effect of this provision is to require the existence of an effective remedy to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" and to grant appropriate relief (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 26867/02
GRZINCIC c. SLOVENIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 21415/02
However, the Court found in the Grzincic judgment that the conditions laid down in that section were not fulfilled as regards applications concerning terminated proceedings which had been notified to the Slovenian Government before 1 January 2007, such as the present application (see Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 67, 3 May 2007).
- EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 19753/92
CIRICOSTA AND VIOLA v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 21415/02
The Court further reiterates that only delays attributable to the State may justify a finding of a failure to comply with the "reasonable time" requirement (see Ciricosta and Viola v. Italy, 4 December 1995, § 28, Series A no. 337-A). - EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 21415/02
Article 13 of the Convention guarantees an "effective remedy before a national authority" to everyone who claims that his rights and freedoms under the Convention have been violated (see Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 64, Series A no. 28). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 21415/02
However, Article 13 requires a remedy in domestic law only in respect of an alleged grievance which is an arguable one in terms of the Convention (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131).
- EGMR, 24.11.2011 - 22174/06
GREBENC v. SLOVENIA
In the circumstances of the present case and in the light of the criteria laid down in its case-law (see, mutatis mutandis, Repas v. Slovenia, no. 10288/02, § 23, 6 April 2006; Kotnik v. Slovenia, no. 17330/02, §§ 15-17; Rogelj v. Slovenia, no. 21415/02, §§ 68-70) the Court considers that length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.