Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 43443/04, 7749/06, 50340/07, 32208/08, 36990/08, 61475/08, 4527/09, 4532/09, 7922/09, 18948/09, 30003/09, 39826/09, 41103/09, 42108/09, 43315/09, 56159/09, 6973/10, 21875/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 43443/04, 7749/06, 50340/07, 32208/08, 36990/08, 61475/08, 4527/09, 4532/09, 7922/09, 18948/09, 30003/09, 39826/09, 41103/09, 42108/09, 43315/09, 56159/09, 6973/10, 21875/10 (https://dejure.org/2015,5357)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03.03.2015 - 43443/04, 7749/06, 50340/07, 32208/08, 36990/08, 61475/08, 4527/09, 4532/09, 7922/09, 18948/09, 30003/09, 39826/09, 41103/09, 42108/09, 43315/09, 56159/09, 6973/10, 21875/10 (https://dejure.org/2015,5357)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03. März 2015 - 43443/04, 7749/06, 50340/07, 32208/08, 36990/08, 61475/08, 4527/09, 4532/09, 7922/09, 18948/09, 30003/09, 39826/09, 41103/09, 42108/09, 43315/09, 56159/09, 6973/10, 21875/10 (https://dejure.org/2015,5357)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,5357) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CHERVYAKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 43443/04
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declarations in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary issue) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03). - EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
BURDOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 43443/04
The Court further reiterates that the adequacy of the offers of compensation should also be assessed with due regard to what was at stake in each particular application and to the amounts of just satisfaction the Court has awarded under the Convention in similar circumstances (see Gerasimov and Others, cited above, § 132, and Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 154, ECHR 2009). - EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 11602/02
SPÓLKA Z O.O. WAZA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 43443/04
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declarations in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary issue) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03).