Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.03.2016 - 57831/13, 68807/13, 69701/13, 69716/13, 80547/13, 142/14, 1730/14, 17108/14, 20213/14, 21880/14, 29617/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 03.03.2016 - 57831/13, 68807/13, 69701/13, 69716/13, 80547/13, 142/14, 1730/14, 17108/14, 20213/14, 21880/14, 29617/14 (https://dejure.org/2016,3035)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03.03.2016 - 57831/13, 68807/13, 69701/13, 69716/13, 80547/13, 142/14, 1730/14, 17108/14, 20213/14, 21880/14, 29617/14 (https://dejure.org/2016,3035)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03. März 2016 - 57831/13, 68807/13, 69701/13, 69716/13, 80547/13, 142/14, 1730/14, 17108/14, 20213/14, 21880/14, 29617/14 (https://dejure.org/2016,3035)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,3035) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CHIRIAC AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2016 - 57831/13
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90-94, ECHR 2000-XI, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 139-165, 10 January 2012). - EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 53254/99
KARALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.03.2016 - 57831/13
It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are "degrading" from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see, amongst many authorities, Karalevicius v. Lithuania, no. 53254/99, §§ 39, 7 April 2005, and Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 145-147, 149).
- EGMR, 10.12.2019 - 71667/17
KUSIC v. CROATIA
On 13 November 2014, in decision U-III-6559/2010 (Official Gazette no. 142/14), the Constitutional Court, referring to the standards for an effective investigation outlined in the Court's judgments in Dolenec v. Croatia (no. 25282/06, §§ 120-130 and 143-145, 26 November 2009), Gladovic v. Croatia (no. 28847/08, §§ 39-40 and 46-49, 10 May 2011), MaÄ?er v. Croatia (no. 56185/07, §§ 105-107 and 111-112, 21 June 2011), urÄ?evic v. Croatia (no. 52442/09, §§ 72-74, 77 and 83-85, ECHR 2011) (extracts) and V.D. v. Croatia (no. 15526/10, §§ 60-65, 8 November 2011), for the first time accepted a constitutional complaint concerning the lack of an effective investigation into the complainant's alleged ill-treatment.