Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 61484/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15841) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BASHCHENKO v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 46129/99
ZVOLSKÝ AND ZVOLSKÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 61484/10
The Court underlines that, since the issue concerns the principle of legal certainty, it raises the question not only of the interpretation of a legal provision in the usual way, but of the unreasonable establishment of a procedural requirement which may prevent a claim from being examined on the merits, thereby entailing a breach of the right to the effective protection of the courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Miragall Escolano and others v. Spain, no. 38366/97, § 37, ECHR 2001-I, and Zvolský and Zvolská v. the Czech Republic judgment, no. 46129/99, § 51, ECHR 2002-IX). - EGMR, 03.04.2008 - 3236/03
PONOMARYOV v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 61484/10
Indeed, unjustified extension of time-limits might in itself entail a breach of "right to court" under Article 6 § 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, Ponomaryov v. Ukraine, no. 3236/03, § 42, 3 April 2008). - EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 61484/10
(a) As regards the applicant's complaint of lack of access to an appeal court, the Court reiterates that the right to court, of which the right of access is one aspect (see the Golder v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 18, § 36), is not absolute; it may be subject to limitations permitted by implication, particularly regarding the conditions of admissibility of an appeal.