Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MEMBERS OF THE GLDANI CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Art. 3, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 11, Art. 14, Art. 41, Art. 34,, Art. 13 MRK
  No violation of Art. 3 as regards some applicants Violation of Art. 3 alone and in conjonction with Art. 14 as regards some applicants in six cases concerning treatment inflicted on their children Violation of Art. 9 alone and in conjonction with Art. 14 as regards ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MEMBRES DE LA CONGRÉGATION DES TÉMOINS DE JÉHOVAH DE GLDANI ET AUTRES c. GÉORGIE

  Art. 3, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 11, Art. 14, Art. 41, Art. 34,, Art. 13 MRK
  Non-violation de l'art. 3 à l'égard de certains requérants Violation de l'art. 3 isolément et en combinaison avec l'art. 14 à l'égard de certains requérants dont six du chef des traitements infligés à leurs enfants Violation de l'art. 9 isolément et en ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.07.2004 - 71156/01
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

Wird zitiert von ... (39)Neu Zitiert selbst (14)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30985/96

  HASSAN ET TCHAOUCH c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  Participation in the life of a religious community is a manifestation of one's religion, protected by Article 9 of the Convention (see Hassan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 62, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  150.  As to the applicants' request as described in paragraph 146 above, the Government pointed out that the Court's judgments were declaratory and that it was not for the Court to indicate to a Government the means by which a judgment was to be executed (see, among other examples, Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII).
• EGMR, 23.05.1991 - 11662/85

  Oberschlick ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  Oberschlick v. Austria (No. 1) , judgment of 23 May 1991, Series A no. 204, § 65).

 
• EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 39748/98

  MAESTRI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  154.  With regard to the applicants' suggestion concerning a measure to be indicated to the Government (see paragraph 146 above), the Court points out that a judgment in which the Court finds a violation of the Convention or its Protocols imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction, but also to choose, subject to supervision by the Committee of Ministers, the general and/or, if appropriate, individual measures to be adopted in its domestic legal order to put an end to the violation found by the Court and to redress so far as possible the effects in such a way as to restore as far as possible the situation existing before the breach (see Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004-I).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  mutatis mutandis, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, §§ 78-79, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

  ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  mutatis mutandis, Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 149, ECHR 2004-II).
• EGMR, 14.12.1999 - 38178/97

  SERIF c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  Serif v. Greece , no. 38178/97, § 53, ECHR 1999-IX).
• EGMR, 03.10.2000 - 28369/95

  CAMP ET BOURIMI c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  Camp and Bourimi v. the Netherlands , no. 28369/95, § 37, ECHR 2000-X, and.
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 49, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02

  CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 338, ECHR 2005-...) that these individuals were subjected to ill-treatment.
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95

  Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

• EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 48420/10

  Eweida u.a. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich - Religionsfreiheit am Arbeitsplatz

  Or à ce jour, la Cour n'aurait conclu à la violation par l'État d'une obligation positive tirée de l'article 9 que dans une affaire, à savoir Membres de la Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de Gldani et autres c. Géorgie (no 71156/01, 3 mai 2007), où les instances de l'État n'avaient rien fait après la violente attaque d'une congrégation de témoins de Jéhovah par un groupe de chrétiens orthodoxes.
• EGMR, 13.12.2012 - 39630/09

  El Masri klagt gegen Mazedonien

  L'Etat défendeur doit être considéré comme directement responsable de la violation des droits du requérant de ce chef, ses agents ayant activement facilité le traitement litigieux puis s'étant abstenus de prendre pour l'empêcher les mesures qui auraient été nécessaires dans les circonstances de la cause (Membres de la Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de Gldani et autres c. Géorgie, no 71156/01, §§ 124-125, 3 mai 2007, Z et autres c. Royaume-Uni, précité, et M.C. c. Bulgarie, no 39272/98, § 149, CEDH 2003-XII).
• EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 38263/08

  GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)

  Lastly, although they were present at the scene, the Russian forces did not intervene to prevent the impugned treatment (see, mutatis mutandis, Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 73-75, ECHR 2001-V; M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 149, ECHR 2003-XII; Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no. 71156/01, §§ 124-25, 3 May 2007; and El-Masri, cited above, § 211).

 
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 41526/10

  DORDEVIC c. CROATIE

  Une autre considération pertinente est la nécessité de s'assurer que la police exerce son pouvoir de juguler et de prévenir la criminalité en respectant pleinement les voies légales et autres garanties qui limitent légitimement l'étendue de ses actes d'investigations criminelles et de traduction des délinquants en justice, y compris les garanties figurant à l'article 8 de la Convention (Mubilanzila Mayeka et Kaniki Mitunga c. Belgique, no 13178/03, § 53, CEDH 2006-XI, Membres de la Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de Gldani et autres c. Géorgie, no 71156/01, § 96, 3 mai 2007, et Milanovic, précité, § 84 ; voir aussi, mutatis mutandis, Osman, précité, § 116).
• EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 26587/07

  KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  See 97 members of the Gladani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and 4 Others v. Georgia, no. 71156/01, §§ 140-142, 3 May 2007; and Commission on Human Rights resolution 2001/42, cited above, paragraph 4 (a); Commission on Human Rights resolution 2005/40, cited above, paragraph 4 (a); Human Rights Council resolution 6/37, cited above, paragraph 9 (a); Human Rights Council Resolution 22/20, cited above, paragraph 8 (a); General Assembly resolution 65/211, cited above, paragraph 12 (a), which urged States "To ensure that their constitutional and legislative systems provide adequate and effective guarantees of freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief to all without distinction, inter alia by the provision of effective remedies in cases where the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief, the right to practise freely one's religion, including the right to change one's religion or belief, is violated"; Commission on Human Rights resolution 2001/42, cited above, paragraph 4 (e); Commission on Human Rights resolution 2005/40, cited above, paragraph 4 (b); Human Rights Council resolution 6/37, cited above, paragraph 9 (e), which urged States "To exert the utmost efforts, in accordance with their national legislation and in conformity with international human rights and humanitarian law, to ensure that religious places, sites, shrines and symbols are fully respected and protected and to take additional measures in cases where they are vulnerable to desecration or destruction"; the Report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion on India, E/CN.4/1997/91/Add.1, paragraph 93; the Report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion, E/CN.4/2005/61, paragraphs 48-52; the Report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion on Romania, E/CN.4/2004/63/Add.2, paragraph 104.
• EGMR, 19.02.2015 - 75450/12

  M.S. v. CROATIA (No. 2)

  Even when strictly speaking no complaint has been made, an investigation must be started if there are sufficiently clear indications that ill-treatment might have occurred (see, amongst many others, Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no. 71156/01, § 97, 3 May 2007; Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937/06, §§ 96-97, 19 June 2012; Bures, cited above, § 127; and Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750/09, § 62, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 24225/19

  GEORGIAN MUSLIM RELATIONS AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  They referred to the Court's judgments in Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia (no. 71156/01, 3 May 2007) and Begheluri and Others v. Georgia (no. 28490/02, 7 October 2014) in which the Court, in relation to religious violence against Jehovah's Witnesses, had awarded between EUR 120 and EUR 700 to the applicants.
• EGMR, 17.09.2020 - 62439/12

  KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  It is, in my eyes, an example of such overreach in the form of an undue extension or enlarging of the existing case-law under Article 2. It creates what, in my view, are new requirements on domestic authorities which they, in their endeavour to ensure they comply with the requirements under Article 2, are likely to find difficult to apply "in a manner which fully respects the due process and other guarantees which legitimately place restraints on the scope of their action" (see Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium, no. 13178/03, § 53, ECHR 2006-XI; Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no. 71156/01, § 96, 3 May 2007).
• EGMR, 09.07.2015 - 32325/13

  MAFALANI v. CROATIA

  This is so because Article 3 of the Convention requires an official investigation in cases where there are sufficiently clear indications that ill-treatment might have occurred (see Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no. 71156/01, § 97, 3 May 2007; and Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750/09, § 62, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 16.04.2015 - 36552/05

  ZAYEV c. RUSSIE

  Même lorsqu'une plainte proprement dite n'est pas formulée, il y a lieu d'ouvrir une enquête s'il existe des indications suffisamment précises donnant à penser qu'on se trouve en présence de cas de torture ou de mauvais traitements (Membres de la Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de Gldani et autres c. Géorgie, no 71156/01, § 97, 3 mai 2007, Velev c. Bulgarie, no 43531/08, § 60, 16 avril 2013, ainsi que El-Masri, précité, § 186 in fine).
• EGMR, 24.02.2015 - 30587/13

  KARAAHMED v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 7224/11

  AGHDGOMELASHVILI AND JAPARIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  GJINI v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 48475/09

  SAKIR c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 13320/02

  KYRIACOU TSIAKKOURMAS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 16143/10

  G.U. c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 08.06.2021 - 48329/19

  ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION "ROMUVA" v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 05.11.2020 - 31454/10

  CWIK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 3289/10

  BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 522/04

  ALIEV c. GEORGIE
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 3832/06

  M.N. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 18911/17

  A.E. AND T.B. v. ITALY
• EGMR, 12.10.2023 - 20605/13

  GURBANOV AND MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 01.12.2022 - 14260/17

  D.K. c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 73204/13

  WOMEN'S INITIATIVES SUPPORTING GROUP AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 35880/14

  ZAKHAROV AND VARZHABETYAN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 15397/02

  KAVAKLIOGLU ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 49742/09

  BASTÜRK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 32662/06

  BISER KOSTOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42390/07

  B. c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 43982/06

  M.B. c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 61030/08

  B.V. c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 39326/02

  ÇELIK v. TURKEY (No. 2)
• EGMR, 12.11.2020 - 36046/15

  MIGORYANU AND RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF THE CITY OF IZMAIL v. …
• EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 27782/10

  R.I.P. ET D.L.P. c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 9264/15

  B.Ü. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 19437/05

  ANTONOVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 58169/13

  MASLÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 12338/02

  HUSSAIN c. ROUMANIE