Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHOKKAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) No violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) No violation of Art. 3 ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41009/04

  The Court has to establish first whether the costs and expenses indicated by the applicants" representatives were actually incurred and, second, whether they were necessary (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324).
• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97

  WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41009/04

  It marks out the temporal limits of the supervision carried out by the Convention institutions and signals to both individuals and State authorities the period beyond which such supervision is no longer possible (see Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41009/04

  The Court reiterates that "where an individual makes a credible assertion that he has suffered treatment infringing Article 3 at the hands of the police or other similar agents of the State, that provision, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in... [the] Convention, requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation" (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 21894/93

  AKKUM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41009/04

  The burden of proof is thus shifted to the Government and if they fail in their arguments, issues will arise under Article 2 and/or Article 3 (see ToÄ?cu v. Turkey, no. 27601/95, § 95, 31 May 2005, and Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894/93, § 211, ECHR 2005-II).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41009/04

  The Court observes that in previous cases it has found this explanation insufficient to justify the withholding of key information requested by it (see Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 123, ECHR 2006-XIII).

• EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 59297/12

  M.G. c. BULGARIE

  Il s'agissait notamment de cas de disparitions forcées, de torture et de traitements inhumains et dégradants, ainsi que d'absence d'enquêtes effectives sur les allégations relatives à ces violations (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Bazorkina c. Russie, no 69481/01, 27 juillet 2006, Loulouïev et autres c. Russie, no 69480/01, CEDH 2006-XIII (extraits), Mutsolgova et autres c. Russie, no 2952/06, 1er avril 2010, Shokkarov et autres c. Russie, no 41009/04, 3 mai 2011, et Velkhiyev et autres c. Russie, no 34085/06, 5 juillet 2011).