Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ANASTASSAKOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 13 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 1948/04

  Somalia, Abschiebungshindernis, zielstaatsbezogene Abschiebungshindernisse, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41380/06

  Equally, an applicant cannot be regarded as having failed to exhaust domestic remedies if he or she can show, by providing relevant domestic case-law or any other suitable evidence, that an available remedy which he or she has not used was bound to fail (see Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 156, ECHR 2003-VI, and Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, §§ 121 et seq., ECHR 2007-I (extracts)).
• EGMR, 02.09.2008 - 15301/04

  TAMM v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41380/06

  Nonetheless, the Court has already accepted that the mere existence of doubts as to the effectiveness of a domestic remedy does not automatically absolve the applicant from the obligation to use it (see, inter alia, Back v. Finland (dec.), no. 23773/94, 9 April 1996, and Tamm v. Estonia (dec.), no. 15301/04, 2 September 2008).
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41380/06

  The Court observes that the presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 is one of the elements of the fair criminal trial that is required by paragraph 1 (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308).

 
• EKMR, 09.04.1996 - 23773/94

  BACK v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41380/06

  Nonetheless, the Court has already accepted that the mere existence of doubts as to the effectiveness of a domestic remedy does not automatically absolve the applicant from the obligation to use it (see, inter alia, Back v. Finland (dec.), no. 23773/94, 9 April 1996, and Tamm v. Estonia (dec.), no. 15301/04, 2 September 2008).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41380/06

  It prohibits the premature expression by the tribunal itself of the opinion that the person "charged with a criminal offence" is guilty before he has been so proved according to law (see Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41380/06

  In the present case, the judgments submitted by the Government accepted, at least partially, the civil liability of the State under section 105 of the Introductory Law to the Civil Code for acts or omissions attributed to judicial authorities, and the applicants have not put forward a valid reason, or established the existence of any special circumstances, which would render the remedy referred to by the Government inadequate and ineffective (see, for example, Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 68, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 39343/98

  KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41380/06

  Equally, an applicant cannot be regarded as having failed to exhaust domestic remedies if he or she can show, by providing relevant domestic case-law or any other suitable evidence, that an available remedy which he or she has not used was bound to fail (see Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 156, ECHR 2003-VI, and Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, §§ 121 et seq., ECHR 2007-I (extracts)).
• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24724/94

  Mord an James Bulger

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 41380/06

  The burden of proof is on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that an effective remedy was available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, namely, that the remedy was accessible, capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724/94, § 55, 16 December 1999).

• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 57333/14

  BELTSIOS v. GREECE

  The Government next submitted that the applicant had not exhausted domestic remedies as he could have brought an action for damages against the State based on Article 105 of the Introductory Law to the Civil Code for the damage allegedly caused by the State's authorities and invoked Anastassakos and others v. Greece ((dec.), no. 41380/06, 3 May 2011).
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 34692/08

  VIHOS c. GRÈCE

  Se référant à l'arrêt Craxi c. Italie (no. 2) (no 25337/94, 17 juillet 2003) et à l'affaire Anastassakos et autres c. Grèce (no 41380/06, pendante devant la Cour), il se plaint de l'omission des autorités de garantir la confidentialité des informations le mettant en cause et divulgués dans un tabloïd.