Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 66609/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15990) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
IOANNIS KARAGIANNIS v. GREECE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 04.06.2009 - 34769/06
PAROUSIS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 66609/09
On the contrary, the Court is of the opinion that the actual length of the proceedings - which was approximately six years and two months - without taking into account the applicant's delay regarding the lodging of an appeal on points of law, remains excessive (see in this respect, Parousis v. Greece, no. 34769/06, § 19, 4 June 2009; Serafimidis v. Greece [Committee], no. 12929/08, 25 November 2010). - EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 36432/05
KOUROUPIS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 66609/09
It notes that the objections and arguments put forward by the Government have been rejected in earlier cases (see Kouroupis v. Greece, no. 36432/05, § 20, 27 March 2008, Tsoukalas v. Greece, no. 12286/08, §§ 37-43, 22 July 2010 and Vihos v. Greece, no. 34692/08, § 37, 10 February 2011) and sees no reason to reach a different conclusion in the present case. - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 66609/09
The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
- EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 34692/08
VIHOS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 66609/09
It notes that the objections and arguments put forward by the Government have been rejected in earlier cases (see Kouroupis v. Greece, no. 36432/05, § 20, 27 March 2008, Tsoukalas v. Greece, no. 12286/08, §§ 37-43, 22 July 2010 and Vihos v. Greece, no. 34692/08, § 37, 10 February 2011) and sees no reason to reach a different conclusion in the present case. - EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 66609/09
Further, the Court reiterates that, according to its case-law, while Article 6 § 1 of the Convention requires courts to give reasons for their decisions, this is not to be understood as requiring a detailed reply to every argument (see Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, 19 April 1994, § 61, Series A no. 288). - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 66609/09
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 22.07.2010 - 12286/08
TSOUKALAS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 66609/09
It notes that the objections and arguments put forward by the Government have been rejected in earlier cases (see Kouroupis v. Greece, no. 36432/05, § 20, 27 March 2008, Tsoukalas v. Greece, no. 12286/08, §§ 37-43, 22 July 2010 and Vihos v. Greece, no. 34692/08, § 37, 10 February 2011) and sees no reason to reach a different conclusion in the present case. - EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 12929/08
SERAFIMIDIS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 66609/09
On the contrary, the Court is of the opinion that the actual length of the proceedings - which was approximately six years and two months - without taking into account the applicant's delay regarding the lodging of an appeal on points of law, remains excessive (see in this respect, Parousis v. Greece, no. 34769/06, § 19, 4 June 2009; Serafimidis v. Greece [Committee], no. 12929/08, 25 November 2010).