Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 42372/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,11392) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
YEREMENKO v. RUSSIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 42372/08
According to the Court's case-law, this provision applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see, among other authorities, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 51, Series A no. 131). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 42372/08
It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
- EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 4991/06
SHEVCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Given this finding, the applicants" complaint about the lack of an effective remedy for their non-enforcement complaint raises no issue and is also manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention (see Yeremenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 42372/08, §§ 35-38 ECHR 2016). - EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 8720/12
PARYGINA AND BULIN v. RUSSIA
As regards application no. 41785/13, the Court notes that since it has found that the applicant's complaint under Article 3 pertaining to the quality of the medical aid is manifestly ill-founded, no issue under Article 13 of the Convention arises in the present case (see Yeremenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 42372/08, §§ 35-38 ECHR 2016). - EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 44214/11
SUSLOVA v. RUSSIA
It follows that this complaint is also manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention (see Yeremenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 42372/08, §§ 35-38 ECHR 2016).