Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,11403) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MANUKIAN v. GEORGIA
Partly struck out of the list;Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MANUKIAN v. GEORGIA
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 46231/99
AYDIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
Where time is of the essence for resolving an issue in a case, there is a burden on the applicant to ensure that his or her claims are raised before both the relevant domestic authorities and the Court with the necessary expedition to ensure that they may be properly and fairly resolved (see, amongst others, Bayram and Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III, and Aydin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46231/99, 26 May 2005). - EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 35485/05
HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, §§ 205-207, 26 July 2011; see also, mutatis mutandis, Ognyanova and Choban v. Bulgaria, no. 46317/99, § 99, 23 February 2006; Antipenkov v. Russia, no. 33470/03, § 69, 15 October 2009; and Virabyan v. Armenia, no. 40094/05, § 153, 2 October 2012). - EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 40094/05
VIRABYAN v. ARMENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, §§ 205-207, 26 July 2011; see also, mutatis mutandis, Ognyanova and Choban v. Bulgaria, no. 46317/99, § 99, 23 February 2006; Antipenkov v. Russia, no. 33470/03, § 69, 15 October 2009; and Virabyan v. Armenia, no. 40094/05, § 153, 2 October 2012).
- EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 53073/07
MANUKYAN v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
All those factors can mean that the Court's own examination and judgment may be deprived of meaningfulness and effectiveness (see Manukyan v. Georgia (dec.), no. 53073/07, § 28, 9 October 2012, with further references therein). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
To that end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular in Tahsin Acar v. Turkey ((preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); (see also WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 33470/03
ANTIPENKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, §§ 205-207, 26 July 2011; see also, mutatis mutandis, Ognyanova and Choban v. Bulgaria, no. 46317/99, § 99, 23 February 2006; Antipenkov v. Russia, no. 33470/03, § 69, 15 October 2009; and Virabyan v. Armenia, no. 40094/05, § 153, 2 October 2012). - EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 34529/10
GUTSANOVI c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
In those circumstances, the ongoing trial could not have enabled the applicant to obtain redress for the alleged ill-treatment and whatever expectations he may have had in that regard were groundless (see Vuckovic and Others, cited above, para.75; see also, mutatis mutandis, Akhvlediani and Others (cited above), § 25, and Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 34529/10, §§ 98-99, ECHR 2013 (extracts)). - EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97
BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
Where time is of the essence for resolving an issue in a case, there is a burden on the applicant to ensure that his or her claims are raised before both the relevant domestic authorities and the Court with the necessary expedition to ensure that they may be properly and fairly resolved (see, amongst others, Bayram and Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III, and Aydin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46231/99, 26 May 2005). - EGMR, 23.02.2006 - 46317/99
OGNYANOVA AND CHOBAN v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, §§ 205-207, 26 July 2011; see also, mutatis mutandis, Ognyanova and Choban v. Bulgaria, no. 46317/99, § 99, 23 February 2006; Antipenkov v. Russia, no. 33470/03, § 69, 15 October 2009; and Virabyan v. Armenia, no. 40094/05, § 153, 2 October 2012).
- EGMR, 10.03.2022 - 37662/11
DOLIDZE v. GEORGIA
Last but not least, the applicant never lodged a criminal complaint concerning his alleged ill-treatment by police officers (see Manukian v. Georgia (dec.) [Committee], no. 49448/08, § 35, 3 May 2016).