Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,11403
EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,11403)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03.05.2016 - 49448/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,11403)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03. Mai 2016 - 49448/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,11403)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,11403) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

  • EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 46231/99

    AYDIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
    Where time is of the essence for resolving an issue in a case, there is a burden on the applicant to ensure that his or her claims are raised before both the relevant domestic authorities and the Court with the necessary expedition to ensure that they may be properly and fairly resolved (see, amongst others, Bayram and Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III, and Aydin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46231/99, 26 May 2005).
  • EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 35485/05

    HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
    35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, §§ 205-207, 26 July 2011; see also, mutatis mutandis, Ognyanova and Choban v. Bulgaria, no. 46317/99, § 99, 23 February 2006; Antipenkov v. Russia, no. 33470/03, § 69, 15 October 2009; and Virabyan v. Armenia, no. 40094/05, § 153, 2 October 2012).
  • EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 40094/05

    VIRABYAN v. ARMENIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
    35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, §§ 205-207, 26 July 2011; see also, mutatis mutandis, Ognyanova and Choban v. Bulgaria, no. 46317/99, § 99, 23 February 2006; Antipenkov v. Russia, no. 33470/03, § 69, 15 October 2009; and Virabyan v. Armenia, no. 40094/05, § 153, 2 October 2012).
  • EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 53073/07

    MANUKYAN v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
    All those factors can mean that the Court's own examination and judgment may be deprived of meaningfulness and effectiveness (see Manukyan v. Georgia (dec.), no. 53073/07, § 28, 9 October 2012, with further references therein).
  • EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

    SULWINSKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
    To that end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular in Tahsin Acar v. Turkey ((preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); (see also WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).
  • EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 33470/03

    ANTIPENKOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
    35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, §§ 205-207, 26 July 2011; see also, mutatis mutandis, Ognyanova and Choban v. Bulgaria, no. 46317/99, § 99, 23 February 2006; Antipenkov v. Russia, no. 33470/03, § 69, 15 October 2009; and Virabyan v. Armenia, no. 40094/05, § 153, 2 October 2012).
  • EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 34529/10

    GUTSANOVI c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
    In those circumstances, the ongoing trial could not have enabled the applicant to obtain redress for the alleged ill-treatment and whatever expectations he may have had in that regard were groundless (see Vuckovic and Others, cited above, para.75; see also, mutatis mutandis, Akhvlediani and Others (cited above), § 25, and Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 34529/10, §§ 98-99, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97

    BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
    Where time is of the essence for resolving an issue in a case, there is a burden on the applicant to ensure that his or her claims are raised before both the relevant domestic authorities and the Court with the necessary expedition to ensure that they may be properly and fairly resolved (see, amongst others, Bayram and Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III, and Aydin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46231/99, 26 May 2005).
  • EGMR, 23.02.2006 - 46317/99

    OGNYANOVA AND CHOBAN v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
    35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, §§ 205-207, 26 July 2011; see also, mutatis mutandis, Ognyanova and Choban v. Bulgaria, no. 46317/99, § 99, 23 February 2006; Antipenkov v. Russia, no. 33470/03, § 69, 15 October 2009; and Virabyan v. Armenia, no. 40094/05, § 153, 2 October 2012).
  • EGMR, 10.03.2022 - 37662/11

    DOLIDZE v. GEORGIA

    Last but not least, the applicant never lodged a criminal complaint concerning his alleged ill-treatment by police officers (see Manukian v. Georgia (dec.) [Committee], no. 49448/08, § 35, 3 May 2016).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht