Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LÓPEZ GUIÓ v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  López Guió v. Slovakia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  LOPEZ GUIO v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 10280/12
• EGMR, 14.09.2016 - 10280/12

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 20.03.2007 - 5410/03

  TYSIAC c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 10280/12

  In that respect, the Court reiterates that positive obligations under Article 8 of the Convention may involve the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for family life even in the sphere of relations between individuals, including both the provision of a regulatory framework of adjudicatory and enforcement machinery protecting individuals" rights and the implementation, where appropriate, of specific measures (see, mutatis mutandis, Tysiac v. Poland, no. 5410/03, § 110, ECHR 2007-I).
• EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 60041/08

  GREENS ET M.T. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 10280/12

  In so far as the applicant may be understood as seeking a form of aggravated or punitive damages, the Court recalls that it has declined to make any such awards in the past (see, for example, Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, § 97, ECHR 2010 (extracts), with further references).
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14556/89

  PAPAMICHALOPOULOS ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 10280/12

  In other words, the procedural protection enjoyed by applicants at the domestic level in respect of their rights protected under Article 8 of the Convention has to be practical and effective (see, among many other authorities, Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, § 42, 24 June 1993, Series A no. 260-B, and also Turek v. Slovakia, no. 57986/00, § 113, ECHR 2006-II (extracts)), and consequently compatible with that Article.

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 12.01.2023 - C-638/22

  Rzecznik Praw Dziecka u.a. (Suspension de la décision de retour)

  48 Vgl. u. a. EGMR, Urteil vom 3. Juni 2014, López Guió/Slowakei (CE:ECHR:2014:0603JUD001028012, § 82).

  51 Vgl. u. a. EGMR, Urteil vom 3. Juni 2014, López Guió/Slowakei, CE:ECHR:2014:0603JUD001028012, §§ 107 bis 109, und EGMR, Urteil vom 13. Januar 2015, Hoholm/Slowakei (CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD003563213, §§ 49, 52 und 53).