Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  E.M. AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 14, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 20192/07
• EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 20192/07
• EGMR - 20192/07

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 20192/07

  In particular, as a corollary to this, if a foreseeable risk of this nature materialises without the patient having been duly informed in advance by doctors, the State Party concerned may be held directly liable under Article 8 for this failure to provide information (see Trocellier v. France (dec.), no 75725/01, § 4, ECHR 2006-XIV; Vo, cited above, § 89; Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, § 105, 2 June 2009; and Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 63, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 20192/07

  They also require an effective independent judicial system to be set up so that the cause of death of patients in the care of the medical profession, whether in the public or private sector, can be determined and those responsible be held accountable (see, among other authorities, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002-I; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Eugenia Lazar, cited above, § 66-71; and G.N. and Others v. Italy, no. 43134/05, §§ 69, 80 and 81, 1 December 2009).
• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 75725/01

  TROCELLIER v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 20192/07

  In particular, as a corollary to this, if a foreseeable risk of this nature materialises without the patient having been duly informed in advance by doctors, the State Party concerned may be held directly liable under Article 8 for this failure to provide information (see Trocellier v. France (dec.), no 75725/01, § 4, ECHR 2006-XIV; Vo, cited above, § 89; Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, § 105, 2 June 2009; and Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 63, ECHR 2002-III).

 
• EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 8759/05

  CSOMA v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 20192/07

  The Court has also found it unacceptable that an operation could be performed without observing the rules and the safeguards created by the domestic system itself in this respect (see Csoma v. Romania, no. 8759/05, § 57, 15 January 2013).
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 20192/07

  They also require an effective independent judicial system to be set up so that the cause of death of patients in the care of the medical profession, whether in the public or private sector, can be determined and those responsible be held accountable (see, among other authorities, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002-I; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Eugenia Lazar, cited above, § 66-71; and G.N. and Others v. Italy, no. 43134/05, §§ 69, 80 and 81, 1 December 2009).
• EGMR, 04.04.2018 - 43134/05

  G.N. ET AUTRES CONTRE L'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 20192/07

  They also require an effective independent judicial system to be set up so that the cause of death of patients in the care of the medical profession, whether in the public or private sector, can be determined and those responsible be held accountable (see, among other authorities, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002-I; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII; Eugenia Lazar, cited above, § 66-71; and G.N. and Others v. Italy, no. 43134/05, §§ 69, 80 and 81, 1 December 2009).