Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FAKAS v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01

  STEC ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 4519/11

  65731/01 and 65900/01, § 54, ECHR 2005-X); the importance of that interest should also be reflected by holding Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to be applicable (see Moskal v. Poland, no. 10373/05, § 39, 15 September 2009).
• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 73049/01

  Budweiser-Streit

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 4519/11

  v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 65, ECHR 2007-I).
• EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00

  VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 4519/11

  Although the national courts did not address the applicant's claim related to the period between September 2001 and December 2001 in more detail, which would enable the Court to see more clearly whether the her claim was adequately met, the Court draws attention to its supervisory role, which is subject to the principle of subsidiarity (see, mutatis mutandis, Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 61, ECHR 2007-II).

• EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 32667/19

  DOMENECH ARADILLA AND RODRÍGUEZ GONZÁLEZ v. SPAIN

  It places no restriction on the Contracting States' freedom to decide whether or not to have in place any form of social security scheme (see Sukhanov and Ilchenko v. Ukraine, nos. 68385/10 and 71378/10, § 36, 26 June 2014, nos. 68385/10 and 71378/10; Kolesnyk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 57116/10, §§ 89 and 91, 3 June 2014; Fakas v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 4519/11, §§ 34, 37-43, 48, 3 June 2014; and Fedulov v. Russia, no. 53068/08, § 66, 8 October 2019).
• EGMR, 26.01.2023 - 22386/19

  VALVERDE DIGON v. SPAIN

  It places no restriction on the Contracting States' freedom to decide whether or not to have in place any form of social security scheme (see Sukhanov and Ilchenko v. Ukraine, nos. 68385/10 and 71378/10, § 36, 26 June 2014; Kolesnyk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 57116/10, §§ 89 and 91, 3 June 2014; Fakas v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 4519/11, §§ 34, 37-43, 48, 3 June 2014; and Fedulov v. Russia, no. 53068/08, § 66, 8 October 2019).