Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.06.2021 - 48431/18 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BUSUTTIL v. MALTA
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BUSUTTIL v. MALTA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 1828/06
G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2021 - 48431/18
The Court has previously found that the Contracting States may, in principle and under certain conditions, penalise a simple or objective fact as such, irrespective of whether it results from criminal intent or from negligence (see G.I.E.M. S.R.L. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828/06 and 2 others, § 243, 28 June 2018; Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619/97, § 100, ECHR 2002-VII, and Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, Series A no. 141-A, § 27)."The Court has previously found that the Contracting States may, in principle and under certain conditions, penalise a simple or objective fact as such, irrespective of whether it results from criminal intent or from negligence (see G.I.E.M. S.R.L. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828/06 and 2 others, § 243, 28 June 2018; Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619/97, § 100, ECHR 2002-VII; and Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, Series A no. 141-A, § 27).".
- EGMR, 23.07.2002 - 34619/97
JANOSEVIC c. SUEDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2021 - 48431/18
The Court has previously found that the Contracting States may, in principle and under certain conditions, penalise a simple or objective fact as such, irrespective of whether it results from criminal intent or from negligence (see G.I.E.M. S.R.L. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828/06 and 2 others, § 243, 28 June 2018; Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619/97, § 100, ECHR 2002-VII, and Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, Series A no. 141-A, § 27)."The Court has previously found that the Contracting States may, in principle and under certain conditions, penalise a simple or objective fact as such, irrespective of whether it results from criminal intent or from negligence (see G.I.E.M. S.R.L. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828/06 and 2 others, § 243, 28 June 2018; Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619/97, § 100, ECHR 2002-VII; and Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, Series A no. 141-A, § 27).".
- EGMR, 07.10.1988 - 10519/83
SALABIAKU c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2021 - 48431/18
The Court has previously found that the Contracting States may, in principle and under certain conditions, penalise a simple or objective fact as such, irrespective of whether it results from criminal intent or from negligence (see G.I.E.M. S.R.L. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828/06 and 2 others, § 243, 28 June 2018; Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619/97, § 100, ECHR 2002-VII, and Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, Series A no. 141-A, § 27). - EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09
ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.06.2021 - 48431/18
The Court reiterates that viewed as a procedural guarantee in the context of a criminal trial itself, the presumption of innocence imposes requirements in respect of, inter alia, the burden of proof and legal presumptions of fact and law (see Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424/09, § 93, ECHR 2013).