Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.07.2006 - 59995/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,71298) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DABICH v. \
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 59995/00
- EGMR, 03.07.2006 - 59995/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 10.07.2003 - 58112/00
MULTIPLEX v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2006 - 59995/00
The Court further recalls that the Convention is intended to guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory, but rights that are practical and effective (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 80, ECHR 2004-I; Yakovlev v. Russia, no. 72701/01, § 21, 15 March 2005; Multiplex v. Croatia, no. 58112/00, § 44, 10 July 2003). - EGMR, 23.02.1994 - 16757/90
STANFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2006 - 59995/00
In includes also not only a right to be present, but also to hear and follow the proceedings (see, inter alia, Ziliberberg v. Moldova, no. 61821/00, § 40, 1 February 2005, Stanford v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 23 February 1994, Series A no. 282-A, § 26; BarberaÌ?, MessegueÌ and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, § 78). - EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83
BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2006 - 59995/00
In includes also not only a right to be present, but also to hear and follow the proceedings (see, inter alia, Ziliberberg v. Moldova, no. 61821/00, § 40, 1 February 2005, Stanford v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 23 February 1994, Series A no. 282-A, § 26; BarberaÌ?, MessegueÌ and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, § 78). - EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94
Anforderungen an die unverzügliche Vorführung der festgenommenen Person i.S.d. …
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2006 - 59995/00
As stated in the Court's case-law, an applicant who has exhausted a remedy that is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried others that were available, but probably no more likely to be successful (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III).