Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 10987/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16260) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
IBRAHIM GÜRKAN v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 10987/10
- EGMR, 26.10.2016 - 10987/10
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.11.1993 - 14191/88
HOLM v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 10987/10
Firstly, regarding the applicant's complaint about the lack of legal qualification of one of the members, the Court reiterates that the participation of lay judges on tribunals is not, as such, contrary to Article 6: the principles established in the case-law concerning independence and impartiality are to be applied to lay judges as to professional judges (see Langborger v. Sweden, judgment of 22 June 1989, § 32, Series A no. 155; Fey v. Austria, judgment of 24 February 1993, §§ 27, Series A no. 255-A, 28 and 30; and Holm v. Sweden, judgment of 25 November 1993, § 30, Series A no. 279-A). - EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 48843/99
COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 10987/10
What is decisive is whether his doubts can be held to be objectively justified (see Findlay v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, § 73, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I; Incal v. Turkey, judgment of 9 June 1998, § 71, Reports 1998-IV,; Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843/99, § 104, ECHR 2003-XII). - EGMR, 24.02.1993 - 14396/88
FEY v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 10987/10
Firstly, regarding the applicant's complaint about the lack of legal qualification of one of the members, the Court reiterates that the participation of lay judges on tribunals is not, as such, contrary to Article 6: the principles established in the case-law concerning independence and impartiality are to be applied to lay judges as to professional judges (see Langborger v. Sweden, judgment of 22 June 1989, § 32, Series A no. 155; Fey v. Austria, judgment of 24 February 1993, §§ 27, Series A no. 255-A, 28 and 30; and Holm v. Sweden, judgment of 25 November 1993, § 30, Series A no. 279-A).