Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• HRR Strafrecht

  Art. 8 EMRK; Art. 6 EMRK; Art. 13 GG; Art. 12 GG; § 102 StPO; § 105 StPO
  Recht auf Achtung der Korrespondenz (Kommunikation) insbesondere bei Anwaltskanzleien (Schutz der Vertraulichkeit von Mandantendaten: Begründung der Reichweite einer Durchsuchung beim Rückgriff auf alle elektronische Daten eines Rechtsanwalts; Verhältnismäßigkeit; ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROBATHIN v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence) Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROBATHIN v. AUSTRIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
• rechtsanwalts-kanzlei-wolfratshausen.de (Kurzinformation)

  Verhältnismäßigkeit bei Beschlagnahme in Kanzleiräumen

Besprechungen u.ä.

• diepresse.com (Entscheidungsbesprechung, 15.07.2012)

  Menschenrechte: Straßburg schützt Berufsgeheimnisse

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 30457/06
• EGMR, 05.10.2016 - 30457/06

Papierfundstellen

• NJW 2013, 3081
• DÖV 2012, 774

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 58243/00

  LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 30457/06

  In Kennedy v. the United Kingdom (no. 26839/05, § 151, 18 May 2010), the Court also held that the domestic law must be compatible with the rule of law and accessible to the person concerned, and that the person affected must be able to foresee the consequences of the domestic law for him (see, among many other authorities, Rotaru v. Romania (GC), no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V; Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, § 59, 1 July 2008; and Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198/02, § 37, 10 February 2009).
• EGMR, 19.09.2002 - 62002/00

  TAMOSIUS contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 30457/06

  Elements taken into consideration are, in particular, whether the search was based on a warrant issued by a judge and based on reasonable suspicion; whether the scope of the warrant was reasonably limited; and - where the search of a lawyer's office was concerned - whether the search was carried out in the presence of an independent observer in order to ensure that materials subject to professional secrecy were not removed (see also Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 37, Series A no. 251-B; Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; and Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH, cited above, § 57).
• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 26839/05

  KENNEDY c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 30457/06

  In Kennedy v. the United Kingdom (no. 26839/05, § 151, 18 May 2010), the Court also held that the domestic law must be compatible with the rule of law and accessible to the person concerned, and that the person affected must be able to foresee the consequences of the domestic law for him (see, among many other authorities, Rotaru v. Romania (GC), no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V; Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, § 59, 1 July 2008; and Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198/02, § 37, 10 February 2009).

 
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 30457/06

  Elements taken into consideration are, in particular, whether the search was based on a warrant issued by a judge and based on reasonable suspicion; whether the scope of the warrant was reasonably limited; and - where the search of a lawyer's office was concerned - whether the search was carried out in the presence of an independent observer in order to ensure that materials subject to professional secrecy were not removed (see also Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 37, Series A no. 251-B; Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; and Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH, cited above, § 57).
• EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

  STES COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 30457/06

  In a sphere covered by statutory law, the "law" is the enactment in force as the competent courts have interpreted it (see Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § 43, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 25198/02

  IORDACHI AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 30457/06

  In Kennedy v. the United Kingdom (no. 26839/05, § 151, 18 May 2010), the Court also held that the domestic law must be compatible with the rule of law and accessible to the person concerned, and that the person affected must be able to foresee the consequences of the domestic law for him (see, among many other authorities, Rotaru v. Romania (GC), no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V; Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, § 59, 1 July 2008; and Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198/02, § 37, 10 February 2009).

• EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 24173/18

  KLAUS MÜLLER v. GERMANY

  In einem Bereich, der durch kodifiziertes Recht geregelt ist, ist das "Gesetz" die gültige Rechtsvorschrift so wie sie durch die zuständigen Gerichte ausgelegt wird (siehe Société Colas Est und andere./. Frankreich, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 37971/97, Rdnr. 43, ECHR 2002-III; und Robathin./. Österreich, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 30457/06, Rdnr. 40, 3.
• BGH, 08.10.2015 - I ZB 54/15

  Ergänzenlassen eines Buchauszugs im Wege der Ersatzvornahme auf Kosten des …

  Dies war nach Ablauf der Frist zur Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand gemäß § 234 Abs. 1 ZPO unzulässig (vgl. BGH…, Beschluss vom 5. Juni 2013 - XII ZB 47/10, NJW-RR 2013, 1393 Rn. 14; Beschluss vom 1. Juli 2013 - VI ZB 18/12, NJW 2013, 3081 Rn. 14;… Beschluss vom 19. März 2014 - I ZB 32/13, GRUR-RR 2014, 470 Rn. 8, jeweils mwN).