Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 46133/99, 48183/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,34512) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SMIRNOVA v. RUSSIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 46133/99, 48183/99
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.10.1995 - 15963/90
GRADINGER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 46133/99
As to Article 4 of Protocol No. 7, the Court recalls that the aim of this Convention provision is to prohibit the repetition of criminal proceedings that have been concluded by a final decision (see the Gradinger v. Austria judgment of 23 October 1995, Series A no. 328-C, p. 65, § 53). - EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76
FOTI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 46133/99
In the performance of its task, the Court is, notably, free to attribute to the facts of the case, as found to be established on the evidence before it, a characterisation in law different from that given by the applicant or, if need be, to view the facts in a different manner; furthermore, it has to take account not only of the original application but also of the additional documents intended to complete the latter by eliminating initial omissions or obscurities (see the Foti and Others v. Italy judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, § 44). - EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83
BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.10.2002 - 46133/99
The Court considers, first, that the presumption of innocence guaranteed by Article 6 § 2 of the Convention requires, inter alia, that when carrying out their duties, the members of a court should not start with the preconceived idea that the accused has committed the offence charged; the burden of proof is on the prosecution, and any doubt should benefit the accused (see, among other authorities, the Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, p. 33, § 77).