Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RYBCZYNSCY v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (length) Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 3501/02

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Malinowska v. Poland, no. 35843/97, 14 December 2000).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 3501/02

  However, it is well-established in the Court's case-law that the applicant in principle cannot be reproached for having made full use of the procedures available to him under domestic law (see mutatis mutandis Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 82).

• EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 39742/05

  PIOTR BARANOWSKI v. POLAND

  For the relevant domestic law and practice concerning the available remedies against excessive length of proceedings, see Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-VIII; Rybczynscy v. Poland, no. 3501/02, 3 October 2006; and Bialas v. Poland, no. 69129/01, 10 October 2006.
• EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 7033/06

  TEODORSKI v. POLAND

  For the relevant domestic law and practice concerning the available remedies against excessive length of proceedings, see Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-VIII; Rybczynscy v. Poland, no. 3501/02, 3 October 2006; and Bialas v. Poland, no. 69129/01, 10 October 2006.
• EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 13167/02

  RYDZ v. POLAND

  For the relevant domestic law and practice concerning the available remedies against excessive length of proceedings, see Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005; Rybczynscy v. Poland, no. 3501/02, judgment of 3 October 2006, and Bialas v. Poland, no. 69129/01, judgment of 10 October 2006.
• EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 39840/05

  PAWLAK v. POLAND

  For the relevant domestic law and practice concerning the available remedies against excessive length of proceedings, see Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005; Rybczynscy v. Poland, no. 3501/02, judgment of 3 October 2006, and Bialas v. Poland, no. 69129/01, judgment of 10 October 2006.