Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BOJOLYAN v. ARMENIA

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 23693/03
• EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95

  TANLI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

  Though the Court is not bound by the findings of domestic courts, in normal circumstances it requires cogent elements to lead it to depart from the findings of fact reached by those courts (see Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, pp. 17-18, §§ 29-30, and Tanlı v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 110, ECHR 2001-III (extracts)).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

  In this respect, the Court reiterates the subsidiary nature of its role and notes that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first-instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000, and Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 20.06.2002 - 50963/99

  AL-NASHIF v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

  Threats to national security vary in character and time and are therefore difficult to define in advance (see Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, § 121, 20 June 2002, and Lupsa v. Romania, no. 10337/04, § 37, ECHR 2006).

 
• EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01

  STEEL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

  As set forth in Article 10, this freedom is subject to exceptions, which - as the Court has already said above - must, however, be construed strictly, and the need for any restrictions must be established convincingly (see, among other authorities, Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 87, ECHR 2005-II, and Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698/01, § 101, ECHR 2007-...).
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57942/00

  KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

  57942/00 and 57945/00, § 135, 24 February 2005).
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57945/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

  57942/00 and 57945/00, § 135, 24 February 2005).
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

  Though the Court is not bound by the findings of domestic courts, in normal circumstances it requires cogent elements to lead it to depart from the findings of fact reached by those courts (see Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, pp. 17-18, §§ 29-30, and Tanlı v. Turkey, no. 26129/95, § 110, ECHR 2001-III (extracts)).
• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83

  MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH ET KLAUS BEERMANN c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

  Nor does it exclude from its scope information which is addressed only to a limited circle of people and does not concern the public as a whole (see markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 26, Series A no. 165), including information communicated to a foreign intelligence service (see Sutyagin v. Russia (dec.), no. 30024/02, 8 July 2008).
• EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

  SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

  Accordingly, many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague and the interpretation and application of which are questions of practice (see, among other authorities, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 31, § 49).
• EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88

  OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 23693/03

  The Court further points out that it has previously held in a number of cases that a ban on dissemination of information which no longer had a secret character and was therefore considered to be in the public domain was, in certain circumstances, incompatible with the requirements of Article 10 (see Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, §§ 66-70, and Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2), judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 217, §§ 52-56).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12945/87

  HADJIANASTASSIOU v. GREECE
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

  ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE