Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 19001/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56581) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RJ IMPORT ROGER JAEGER A.G. AND RJ IMPORT BUCURESTI S.A. v. ROMANIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 29.07.2008 - 13386/02
MOLDOVEANU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 19001/05
The relevant domestic law concerning the bankruptcy proceedings, namely excerpts of the Law no. 64/1995 on the reorganisation and bankruptcy, is summed up in the Court's judgment in the case of Moldoveanu v. Romania (no. 13386/02, 29 July 2008).The Court recalls that that it is not open to a State authority to cite the lack of funds or other resources as an excuse for not honouring a court award, nor can the State, in such circumstances, justify its failure to enforce the judgment against a State enterprise with reference to the liquidation of the company (see Grigoryev and Kakaurova v. Russia, no. 13820/04, § 37, 12 April 2007; Moldoveanu v. Romania, no. 13386/02, § 35, 29 July 2008; Aurelia Popa v. Romania, no. 1690/05, § 24, 26 January 2010, and, mutatis mutandis, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002-III).
- EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00
BURDOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 19001/05
The Court recalls that that it is not open to a State authority to cite the lack of funds or other resources as an excuse for not honouring a court award, nor can the State, in such circumstances, justify its failure to enforce the judgment against a State enterprise with reference to the liquidation of the company (see Grigoryev and Kakaurova v. Russia, no. 13820/04, § 37, 12 April 2007; Moldoveanu v. Romania, no. 13386/02, § 35, 29 July 2008; Aurelia Popa v. Romania, no. 1690/05, § 24, 26 January 2010, and, mutatis mutandis, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002-III). - EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 13820/04
GRIGORYEV AND KAKAUROVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 19001/05
The Court recalls that that it is not open to a State authority to cite the lack of funds or other resources as an excuse for not honouring a court award, nor can the State, in such circumstances, justify its failure to enforce the judgment against a State enterprise with reference to the liquidation of the company (see Grigoryev and Kakaurova v. Russia, no. 13820/04, § 37, 12 April 2007; Moldoveanu v. Romania, no. 13386/02, § 35, 29 July 2008; Aurelia Popa v. Romania, no. 1690/05, § 24, 26 January 2010, and, mutatis mutandis, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002-III). - EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 1690/05
AURELIA POPA c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 19001/05
The Court recalls that that it is not open to a State authority to cite the lack of funds or other resources as an excuse for not honouring a court award, nor can the State, in such circumstances, justify its failure to enforce the judgment against a State enterprise with reference to the liquidation of the company (see Grigoryev and Kakaurova v. Russia, no. 13820/04, § 37, 12 April 2007; Moldoveanu v. Romania, no. 13386/02, § 35, 29 July 2008; Aurelia Popa v. Romania, no. 1690/05, § 24, 26 January 2010, and, mutatis mutandis, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002-III).