Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 34973/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,56107) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Sorgic v. Serbia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 34973/06
- EGMR, 14.06.2017 - 34973/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 37235/97
SOFRI et AUTRES contre l'ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 34973/06
The fact that they had not recused themselves from dealing with the civil suit at issue at second and third instance, following their earlier participation in the proceedings, does not constitute the required proof (see, mutatis mutandis, Sofri and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 37235/97, ECHR 2003-VIII; Bracci v. Italy, no. 36822/02, § 52, 13 October 2005; and Previti v. Italy (dec.), no. 45291/06, § 258, 8 December 2009). - EGMR, 13.10.2005 - 36822/02
BRACCI c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 34973/06
The fact that they had not recused themselves from dealing with the civil suit at issue at second and third instance, following their earlier participation in the proceedings, does not constitute the required proof (see, mutatis mutandis, Sofri and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 37235/97, ECHR 2003-VIII; Bracci v. Italy, no. 36822/02, § 52, 13 October 2005; and Previti v. Italy (dec.), no. 45291/06, § 258, 8 December 2009). - EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00
BLECIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 34973/06
In the Court's view, although the Government have not raised an objection as to its competence ratione materiae, this matter nevertheless requires consideration (see, mutatis mutandis, Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III). - EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 45291/06
PREVITI c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 34973/06
The fact that they had not recused themselves from dealing with the civil suit at issue at second and third instance, following their earlier participation in the proceedings, does not constitute the required proof (see, mutatis mutandis, Sofri and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 37235/97, ECHR 2003-VIII; Bracci v. Italy, no. 36822/02, § 52, 13 October 2005; and Previti v. Italy (dec.), no. 45291/06, § 258, 8 December 2009). - EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80
DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 34973/06
Indeed, even appearances may be of importance or, in other words, "justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done" (see De Cubber v. Belgium, judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, § 26; and Meznaric v. Croatia, no.71615/01, § 32, 15 July 2005).