Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 40050/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2011,54173
EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 40050/06 (https://dejure.org/2011,54173)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03.11.2011 - 40050/06 (https://dejure.org/2011,54173)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03. November 2011 - 40050/06 (https://dejure.org/2011,54173)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,54173) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

    GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 40050/06
    Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national court (see Garcia Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I, with further references).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2006 - 46917/99

    STANKIEWICZ c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 40050/06
    The Court reiterates that the resolution of the issue of court costs may have implications for the fairness of the proceedings as a whole (see Stankiewicz v. Poland, no. 46917/99, § 60, ECHR 2006 VI).
  • EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 20928/05

    PETRENCO v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 40050/06
    The Court's task under the Convention is to ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see, for example, Petrenco v. Moldova, no. 20928/05, § 41, 30 March 2010).
  • EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90

    VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 40050/06
    In that respect, they referred to the Court's judgment in the case of Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands (19 April 1994, § 61, Series A no. 288).
  • EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 9815/10

    CEPEK c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE

    N'est pas en jeu non plus, sous l'angle du droit à une procédure contradictoire, la question de savoir si le tribunal s'est fondé sur des motifs arbitraires ou manifestement déraisonnables (voir, au sujet d'une disposition similaire à celle de l'article 150 du CPC, Pyrobatys, A.S. v restrukturalizácii c. Slovaquie (déc.), no 40050/06, § 65, 3 novembre 2011).
  • EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 34216/07

    PIETKA v. POLAND

    However, the Court is of the view that there may also be situations in which issues linked to the determination of litigation costs can be of relevance for the assessment of whether the proceedings in a civil case seen as a whole have complied with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Robins v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1997, § 29, Reports 1997-V; Macková v. Slovakia, no. 51543/99/98, § 55, 29 March 2005; and Pyrobatys A.S. Restrukturalizacii v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 40050/06, 3 November 2011, mutatis mutandis).
  • EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 65102/14

    DUNAS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    The Court observes that the determination of the need to pay the court fees in the present case falls within the purview of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 78, ECHR 2000-V; and Pyrobatys A.S. Restrukturalizacii v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 40050/06, § 59, 3 November 2011), which is accordingly applicable.
  • EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 21392/08

    KARAHASANOGLU v. TURKEY

    The Court observes that the determination of the costs of the trial in the present case falls within the purview of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Robins v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1997, §§ 28 and 29, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-V; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 78, ECHR 2000-V; and Pyrobatys A.S. Restrukturalizacii v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 40050/06, § 59, 3 November 2011), which is accordingly applicable.
  • EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 9970/05

    ASKON AD v. BULGARIA

    The Court has held that costs proceedings, even though separately decided, must be seen as a continuation of the substantive litigation and accordingly as part of a "determination of... civil rights and obligations" (see Robins v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1997, § 29, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-V; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 78, ECHR 2000-V; Macková v. Slovakia, no. 51543/99, § 55, 29 March 2005; Superwood Holdings Plc and Others v. Ireland, no. 7812/04, § 29, 8 September 2011; Pyrobatys A.S. Restrukturalizacii v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 40050/06, § 59, 3 November 2011; and also, mutatis mutandis, Stankiewicz v. Poland, no. 46917/99, § 60, ECHR 2006-VI).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht